[lttng-dev] LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync

[Yannick Brosseau]

On 2013-10-20 00:15, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jon Bernard" <jbernard at debian.org>
>> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
>> Cc: "Stéphane Graber" <stgraber at ubuntu.com>, "Alexandre Montplaisir" <alexmonthy at voxpopuli.im>,
>> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
>> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 5:10:09 PM
>> Subject: Re: LTTng packages in Debian sid out of sync
>>
>> * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Jon,
>>>
>>> We've had a couple of user reports about lttng versions not working in
>>> Debian.
>>>
>>> I'm looking at the current Debian sid, and here is the situation:
>>>
>>> http://packages.debian.org/sid/lttng-tools : version 2.1.1-2
>>> http://packages.debian.org/sid/utils/ltt-bin : version 2.1.1-2
>>> http://packages.debian.org/sid/lttng-modules-dkms : version 2.3.0-1
>>>
>>> Although it's possible that lttng-modules 2.3.x will work with lttng-tools
>>> 2.1.x, this combination of versions is unsupported. We require that
>>> ust/tools/modules be updated in locked step between minor versions (2.1
>>> with
>>> 2.1, 2.2 with 2.2, and so on). Also, 2.1 is starting to be quite old: we're
>>> currently working on an upcoming 2.4, and the last version (2.3) provides
>>> lots
>>> of cool features including flight recorder tracing and snapshot support.
>> Yes, I do apologize for the current state.  My first priority was to resolve
>> the
>> blocked testing migration for ust and lttng-tools.  My upload yesterday seems
>> to
>> have resolved the last of the ust package issues, and so now I need only to
>> upload the remaining fixes for lttng-tools and the two should be eligible for
>> migration to testing.  I decided it would be easier to fix the migration
>> problem
>> first, and then update all of the versions to 2.3.x - it makes perfect sense
>> to
>> me as a packager, but I also see it's completely backwards from a user's
>> perspective.
>>
>> Sid should have 2.3.x immediately and I will push these versions before the
>> weekend ends.
>>
>> The migration is also very important to me, as Jessie will freeze soon.  I
>> will
>> continue on that front after 2.3.x is in sid.
>>
>> Does this sound like a reasonable plan?
> Hi Jon,
>
> We seem to have a problem here. The pace of packaging on Debian currently does not seem to match our support cycle at all. You are currently targeting LTTng 2.1 for testing (and therefore next stable), while we specified a release policy back in August: http://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/2013-August/021132.html which clearly states that we currently support LTTng 2.3, and only do security fix backports for 2.2. Therefore, 2.1 is clearly unsupported at this point.
>
> I strongly advise to update packages in sid ASAP to LTTng 2.3, and we need to know how much time it takes to get it into testing, and figure out if it makes into the upcoming stable. I restate help offer on behalf of the LTTng community: if you lack time to update those packages, please let us know, and we will give a hand ensuring that those are updated in sid soon after the upstream releases.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Thanks,
>
Mathieu, I think you misunderstood Jon,
He plans to upload 2.3 to sid this weekend and they will get into
testing after the normal migration period (normally 10 days).

There was an issue before that was blocking this migration and it seem
that Jon was able to fix it recently.

Yannick