[lttng-dev] current_thread_info() not respecting program order with gcc 4.8.x
Alexander Holler
holler at ahsoftware.de
Thu Nov 21 18:18:58 EST 2013
Am 21.11.2013 23:32, schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Alexander Holler <holler at ahsoftware.de> wrote:
> The bug is not that gcc can re-order or combine the accesses to "sp".
> WE WANT THAT TO HAPPEN.
Sure, and I don't disagree on that.
>
> The bug is *outside* that "current_thread_info()" macro/inline
> function. It's the *dereference* of the pointer that gcc re-orders.
> AND THAT IS WRONG.
>
> Gcc seems to mess up the alias analysis, and decide that the
> deferences cannot alias. Which is wrong. They clearly *can* alias,
> exactly because the value of "sp & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)" ends up having
> the same value all the time.
Sorry, that I still disagree.
I try to describe it more clearly why I still think that the problem
might be because of that const declaration.
(...)
foobar1 = current_thread_info() __attribute_const__ {
return sp->somewhere_local;
}
(...)
foobar2 = current_thread_info() __attribute_const__ {
return sp->somewhere_local;
}
So, even if sp is the same in both cases, that const states that
wherever sp points to is local to current_thread_info(), so it can't be
the same for both cases.
Regards,
Alexander Holler
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list