[lttng-dev] [rp] [PATCH urcu] rculfhash: add assertions on node alignment

Paul E. McKenney paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Feb 14 19:00:57 EST 2013


On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:19:33AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> I've had a report of someone running into issues with the RCU lock-free
> hash table by embedding the struct cds_lfht_node into a packed structure
> by mistake, thus not respecting alignment requirements stated in
> urcu/rculfhash.h. Assertions on "replace" and "add" operations should
> catch this, but I notice that we should add assertions on the
> REMOVAL_OWNER_FLAG to cover all possible misalignments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>

Makes sense to me!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
> diff --git a/rculfhash.c b/rculfhash.c
> index 8c3d621..e0be7df 100644
> --- a/rculfhash.c
> +++ b/rculfhash.c
> @@ -833,13 +833,16 @@ void _cds_lfht_gc_bucket(struct cds_lfht_node *bucket, struct cds_lfht_node *nod
> 
>  	assert(!is_bucket(bucket));
>  	assert(!is_removed(bucket));
> +	assert(!is_removal_owner(bucket));
>  	assert(!is_bucket(node));
>  	assert(!is_removed(node));
> +	assert(!is_removal_owner(node));
>  	for (;;) {
>  		iter_prev = bucket;
>  		/* We can always skip the bucket node initially */
>  		iter = rcu_dereference(iter_prev->next);
>  		assert(!is_removed(iter));
> +		assert(!is_removal_owner(iter));
>  		assert(iter_prev->reverse_hash <= node->reverse_hash);
>  		/*
>  		 * We should never be called with bucket (start of chain)
> @@ -860,6 +863,7 @@ void _cds_lfht_gc_bucket(struct cds_lfht_node *bucket, struct cds_lfht_node *nod
>  			iter = next;
>  		}
>  		assert(!is_removed(iter));
> +		assert(!is_removal_owner(iter));
>  		if (is_bucket(iter))
>  			new_next = flag_bucket(clear_flag(next));
>  		else
> @@ -880,8 +884,10 @@ int _cds_lfht_replace(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size,
>  		return -ENOENT;
> 
>  	assert(!is_removed(old_node));
> +	assert(!is_removal_owner(old_node));
>  	assert(!is_bucket(old_node));
>  	assert(!is_removed(new_node));
> +	assert(!is_removal_owner(new_node));
>  	assert(!is_bucket(new_node));
>  	assert(new_node != old_node);
>  	for (;;) {
> @@ -956,6 +962,7 @@ void _cds_lfht_add(struct cds_lfht *ht,
> 
>  	assert(!is_bucket(node));
>  	assert(!is_removed(node));
> +	assert(!is_removal_owner(node));
>  	bucket = lookup_bucket(ht, size, hash);
>  	for (;;) {
>  		uint32_t chain_len = 0;
> @@ -1016,7 +1023,9 @@ void _cds_lfht_add(struct cds_lfht *ht,
>  	insert:
>  		assert(node != clear_flag(iter));
>  		assert(!is_removed(iter_prev));
> +		assert(!is_removal_owner(iter_prev));
>  		assert(!is_removed(iter));
> +		assert(!is_removal_owner(iter));
>  		assert(iter_prev != node);
>  		if (!bucket_flag)
>  			node->next = clear_flag(iter);
> @@ -1036,6 +1045,7 @@ void _cds_lfht_add(struct cds_lfht *ht,
> 
>  	gc_node:
>  		assert(!is_removed(iter));
> +		assert(!is_removal_owner(iter));
>  		if (is_bucket(iter))
>  			new_next = flag_bucket(clear_flag(next));
>  		else
> @@ -1700,6 +1710,7 @@ int cds_lfht_delete_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht)
>  		if (!is_bucket(node))
>  			return -EPERM;
>  		assert(!is_removed(node));
> +		assert(!is_removal_owner(node));
>  	} while (!is_end(node));
>  	/*
>  	 * size accessed without rcu_dereference because hash table is
> 
> -- 
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rp mailing list
> rp at svcs.cs.pdx.edu
> http://svcs.cs.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/rp
> 




More information about the lttng-dev mailing list