[lttng-dev] [PATCH urcu] rculfhash: add assertions on node alignment
Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com
Thu Feb 14 11:19:33 EST 2013
I've had a report of someone running into issues with the RCU lock-free
hash table by embedding the struct cds_lfht_node into a packed structure
by mistake, thus not respecting alignment requirements stated in
urcu/rculfhash.h. Assertions on "replace" and "add" operations should
catch this, but I notice that we should add assertions on the
REMOVAL_OWNER_FLAG to cover all possible misalignments.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
---
diff --git a/rculfhash.c b/rculfhash.c
index 8c3d621..e0be7df 100644
--- a/rculfhash.c
+++ b/rculfhash.c
@@ -833,13 +833,16 @@ void _cds_lfht_gc_bucket(struct cds_lfht_node *bucket, struct cds_lfht_node *nod
assert(!is_bucket(bucket));
assert(!is_removed(bucket));
+ assert(!is_removal_owner(bucket));
assert(!is_bucket(node));
assert(!is_removed(node));
+ assert(!is_removal_owner(node));
for (;;) {
iter_prev = bucket;
/* We can always skip the bucket node initially */
iter = rcu_dereference(iter_prev->next);
assert(!is_removed(iter));
+ assert(!is_removal_owner(iter));
assert(iter_prev->reverse_hash <= node->reverse_hash);
/*
* We should never be called with bucket (start of chain)
@@ -860,6 +863,7 @@ void _cds_lfht_gc_bucket(struct cds_lfht_node *bucket, struct cds_lfht_node *nod
iter = next;
}
assert(!is_removed(iter));
+ assert(!is_removal_owner(iter));
if (is_bucket(iter))
new_next = flag_bucket(clear_flag(next));
else
@@ -880,8 +884,10 @@ int _cds_lfht_replace(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size,
return -ENOENT;
assert(!is_removed(old_node));
+ assert(!is_removal_owner(old_node));
assert(!is_bucket(old_node));
assert(!is_removed(new_node));
+ assert(!is_removal_owner(new_node));
assert(!is_bucket(new_node));
assert(new_node != old_node);
for (;;) {
@@ -956,6 +962,7 @@ void _cds_lfht_add(struct cds_lfht *ht,
assert(!is_bucket(node));
assert(!is_removed(node));
+ assert(!is_removal_owner(node));
bucket = lookup_bucket(ht, size, hash);
for (;;) {
uint32_t chain_len = 0;
@@ -1016,7 +1023,9 @@ void _cds_lfht_add(struct cds_lfht *ht,
insert:
assert(node != clear_flag(iter));
assert(!is_removed(iter_prev));
+ assert(!is_removal_owner(iter_prev));
assert(!is_removed(iter));
+ assert(!is_removal_owner(iter));
assert(iter_prev != node);
if (!bucket_flag)
node->next = clear_flag(iter);
@@ -1036,6 +1045,7 @@ void _cds_lfht_add(struct cds_lfht *ht,
gc_node:
assert(!is_removed(iter));
+ assert(!is_removal_owner(iter));
if (is_bucket(iter))
new_next = flag_bucket(clear_flag(next));
else
@@ -1700,6 +1710,7 @@ int cds_lfht_delete_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht)
if (!is_bucket(node))
return -EPERM;
assert(!is_removed(node));
+ assert(!is_removal_owner(node));
} while (!is_end(node));
/*
* size accessed without rcu_dereference because hash table is
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list