[lttng-dev] CTF model.emf.uri precision

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Matthew Khouzam (matthew.khouzam at ericsson.com) wrote:
> Hi tracing paladins,
> I was going over the most recent CTF specs. I am curious, at the line:
> 1176   "model.emf.uri = "string";" this looks like a reference to
> something from eclipse modeling framework.
> http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/javadoc/2.7.0/org/eclipse/emf/common/util/URI.html
> 
> Is this part of the CTF specification? Shouldn't this be called
> model.uri or model_uri to respect the naming convention?

if we only call it model.uri, and come up with other model URIs that we
want to encode in the future (not emf-related), then we would be
stucked, wouldn't we ?

What is the benefit of removing the "emf" part ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> I hope someone could clarify this.
> 
> Matthew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com