[lttng-dev] LTTng-UST alternative to LD_PRELOAD
lars at grandepotatis.se
Sun Jun 17 11:08:23 EDT 2012
I have recently started to use LTTng-UST and am using LD_PRELOAD
to make it possilbe to execute instrumented code on systems without
To define LD_PRELOAD however affects too much. For instance all
forked processes also get the library loaded. This can be fixed by
removing the library from the LD_PRELOAD variable early in the main
function. This looks odd and required some explaining in comments.
Also, in my case, the instrumented program is started with a "wrapper"
program which I can not alter. This wrapper also gets the library
As an alternative to using LD_PRELOAD I would like to use an explicit
int traceload(char const* library_path);
that is called early in main (instead of the LD_PRELOAD environment
manipulation) and loads the library with dlopen if it exists.
I have already tried this (of course) and it almost works already.
The tracepoints becomes visible but I get no trace data written.
So I think a really small modification is needed.
Is anything like this planned?
Or can anybody give me a hint on what is missing?
I checked the mailing list a couple of months back but did not
More information about the lttng-dev