[ltt-dev] Trying to compile lttng-tools

Daniel U. Thibault daniel.thibault at drdc-rddc.gc.ca
Thu May 5 14:19:24 EDT 2011


David Goulet <david.goulet <at> polymtl.ca> writes:

> >> But, for now, you can fix that quickly by changing this to
> >> "libustctl/Makefile.am" from the git source of ust.
> >>
> >> -       $(top_builddir)/libustcomm/libustcomm.la
> >> +       $(top_builddir)/libustcomm/libustcomm.la \
> >> +       $(top_builddir)/snprintf/libustsnprintf.la
> >>
> >> Recompile and install ust and should be fine :)

   Unfortunately, I still get the same configure results for lttng-tools once
ust is recompiled and re-installed.

> Actually, there is no "compatible commit" at this time for lttng-tools 
> and UST. This is why there is no release yet of lttng-tools. It is still 
> in very active development and should NOT be use in production yet.

   Okay, I'll put it on ice then.

> > I guess what I really need to know is what is the most recent *coherent*
> > set of commits from git.dorsal.polymtl.ca and git.lttng.org?
> 
> git.lttng.org for everything! The dorsal git is for internal development 
> and nothing "really" public.

   git.lttng.org for everything...except for lttng-tools, right?

   Since I'm focusing on getting Eclipse LTTng working over TCF, any
recommendations as to which git.lttng.org set of releases/commits to use?





More information about the lttng-dev mailing list