[ltt-dev] [PATCH 2/2] introduce uatomic_and and uatomic_or

Paolo Bonzini pbonzini at redhat.com
Fri Nov 12 07:27:24 EST 2010


On 11/12/2010 01:24 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Should I rename uatomic_add to uatomic_xchg_add too (I prefer this name
> to uatomic_return_add)?

Uh, uatomic_add returns void actually.  Then returning void from 
uatomic_{and,or} is indeed more consistent.

Paolo




More information about the lttng-dev mailing list