[lttng-dev] [PATCH 2/7] Use gcc __atomic builtis for <urcu/uatomic.h> implementation
baldrick at free.fr
Mon Mar 20 15:38:59 EDT 2023
> While OK for the general case, I would recommend that we immediately implement
> something more efficient on x86 32/64 which takes into account that
> __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL atomic operations are implemented with LOCK prefixed atomic
> ops, which imply the barrier already, leaving the before/after_uatomic_*() as
maybe first check whether the GCC optimizers merge them. I believe some
optimizations of atomic primitives are allowed and implemented, but I couldn't
say which ones.
Best wishes, Duncan.
More information about the lttng-dev