[lttng-dev] [PATCH urcu] fix: bump tests thread limit to 256
Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com
Wed Dec 9 13:29:47 EST 2020
Hi Paul,
Should I merge this temporary fix for liburcu tests, or should we go
for dynamic allocation of the array right away instead ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
----- On Dec 9, 2020, at 1:15 PM, Michael Jeanson mjeanson at efficios.com wrote:
> Machines with more than 128 CPUs are becomming more common, the proper
> fix here would be to dynamically allocate the array which we will do,
> but in the meantime bump the limit to 256 to fix the problem on a 160
> CPUs ppc64el system where this was reported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Jeanson <mjeanson at efficios.com>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck at kernel.org>
> Change-Id: Ib3cb5d8cb4515e6f626be33c2685fa38cb081782
> ---
> tests/common/api.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/common/api.h b/tests/common/api.h
> index 2b72ec5..b15e588 100644
> --- a/tests/common/api.h
> +++ b/tests/common/api.h
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static void spin_unlock(spinlock_t *sp)
>
> typedef pthread_t thread_id_t;
>
> -#define NR_THREADS 128
> +#define NR_THREADS 256
>
> #define __THREAD_ID_MAP_EMPTY ((thread_id_t) 0)
> #define __THREAD_ID_MAP_WAITING ((thread_id_t) 1)
> --
> 2.29.2
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list