[lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-tools] Clean-up: Remove double buffer initialisation
Jérémie Galarneau
jeremie.galarneau at efficios.com
Thu Apr 25 14:23:34 EDT 2019
Merged in master and stable-2.11.
Thanks!
Jérémie
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:07:43PM -0400, Yannick Lamarre wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yannick Lamarre <ylamarre at efficios.com>
> ---
> src/lib/lttng-ctl/lttng-ctl.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lib/lttng-ctl/lttng-ctl.c b/src/lib/lttng-ctl/lttng-ctl.c
> index 165fef4d..92634c00 100644
> --- a/src/lib/lttng-ctl/lttng-ctl.c
> +++ b/src/lib/lttng-ctl/lttng-ctl.c
> @@ -1078,7 +1078,11 @@ int lttng_enable_event_with_exclusions(struct lttng_handle *handle,
> unsigned int free_filter_expression = 0;
> struct filter_parser_ctx *ctx = NULL;
>
> - memset(&send_buffer, 0, sizeof(send_buffer));
> + /*
> + * We have either a filter or some exclusions, so we need to set up
> + * a variable-length memory block from where to send the data.
> + */
> + lttng_dynamic_buffer_init(&send_buffer);
>
> /*
> * Cast as non-const since we may replace the filter expression
> @@ -1128,12 +1132,6 @@ int lttng_enable_event_with_exclusions(struct lttng_handle *handle,
> lsm.u.enable.exclusion_count = exclusion_count;
> lsm.u.enable.bytecode_len = 0;
>
> - /*
> - * We have either a filter or some exclusions, so we need to set up
> - * a variable-length memory block from where to send the data.
> - */
> - lttng_dynamic_buffer_init(&send_buffer);
> -
> /* Parse filter expression. */
> if (filter_expression != NULL || handle->domain.type == LTTNG_DOMAIN_JUL
> || handle->domain.type == LTTNG_DOMAIN_LOG4J
> --
> 2.11.0
>
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list