[lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-tools] Clean-up: Remove double buffer initialisation

Jérémie Galarneau jeremie.galarneau at efficios.com
Thu Apr 25 14:23:34 EDT 2019


Merged in master and stable-2.11.

Thanks!
Jérémie

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:07:43PM -0400, Yannick Lamarre wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yannick Lamarre <ylamarre at efficios.com>
> ---
>  src/lib/lttng-ctl/lttng-ctl.c | 12 +++++-------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/lib/lttng-ctl/lttng-ctl.c b/src/lib/lttng-ctl/lttng-ctl.c
> index 165fef4d..92634c00 100644
> --- a/src/lib/lttng-ctl/lttng-ctl.c
> +++ b/src/lib/lttng-ctl/lttng-ctl.c
> @@ -1078,7 +1078,11 @@ int lttng_enable_event_with_exclusions(struct lttng_handle *handle,
>  	unsigned int free_filter_expression = 0;
>  	struct filter_parser_ctx *ctx = NULL;
>  
> -	memset(&send_buffer, 0, sizeof(send_buffer));
> +	/*
> +	 * We have either a filter or some exclusions, so we need to set up
> +	 * a variable-length memory block from where to send the data.
> +	 */
> +	lttng_dynamic_buffer_init(&send_buffer);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Cast as non-const since we may replace the filter expression
> @@ -1128,12 +1132,6 @@ int lttng_enable_event_with_exclusions(struct lttng_handle *handle,
>  	lsm.u.enable.exclusion_count = exclusion_count;
>  	lsm.u.enable.bytecode_len = 0;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * We have either a filter or some exclusions, so we need to set up
> -	 * a variable-length memory block from where to send the data.
> -	 */
> -	lttng_dynamic_buffer_init(&send_buffer);
> -
>  	/* Parse filter expression. */
>  	if (filter_expression != NULL || handle->domain.type == LTTNG_DOMAIN_JUL
>  			|| handle->domain.type == LTTNG_DOMAIN_LOG4J
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 


More information about the lttng-dev mailing list