[lttng-dev] Compat syscall instrumentation and return from execve issue

Steven Rostedt rostedt at goodmis.org
Mon Nov 9 21:31:09 EST 2015


On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:51:25 -0800
Andy Lutomirski <luto at amacapital.net> wrote:


> do_syscall_32_irqs_on would call syscall_return_slowpath(regs,
> AUDIT_ARCH_I386).  do_syscall_64 (which doesn't exist yet) would call
> syscall_return_slowpath(regs, AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64).
> 

OK, so you are saying that a execve that switches the current state
into ia32 will return from the do_syscall_64 regardless? Then we would
have to add tracepoints that would be for both ia32 and x86_64. But
that would solve the current issue at hand.

-- Steve



More information about the lttng-dev mailing list