[lttng-dev] Alternative to signals/sys_membarrier() in liburcu
mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com
Thu Mar 12 16:56:00 EDT 2015
(sorry for re-send, my mail client tricked me into posting HTML
Michael Sullivan proposed a clever hack abusing mprotect() to
perform the same effect as sys_membarrier() I submitted a few
years ago ( https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/18/15 ).
At that time, the sys_membarrier implementation was deemed
technically sound, but there were not enough users of the system call
to justify its inclusion.
So far, the number of users of liburcu has increased, but liburcu
still appears to be the only direct user of sys_membarrier. On this
front, we could argue that many other system calls have only
one user: glibc. In that respect, liburcu is quite similar to glibc.
So the question as it stands appears to be: would you be comfortable
having users abuse mprotect(), relying on its side-effect of issuing
a smp_mb() on each targeted CPU for the TLB shootdown, as
an effective implementation of process-wide memory barrier ?
From: "Michael Sullivan" <sully at msully.net>
To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
Cc: lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 12:04:07 PM
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Alternative to signals/sys_membarrier() in liburcu
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers < mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com > wrote:
Even though it depends on internal behavior not currently specified by mprotect,
I'd very much like to see the prototype you have,
I ended up posting my code at https://github.com/msullivan/userspace-rcu/tree/msync-barrier .
The interesting patch is https://github.com/msullivan/userspace-rcu/commit/04656b468d418efbc5d934ab07954eb8395a7ab0 .
Quick blog post I wrote about it at http://www.msully.net/blog/2015/02/24/forcing-memory-barriers-on-other-cpus-with-mprotect2/ .
(I talked briefly about sys_membarrier in the post as best as I could piece together from LKML; if my comment on it is inaccurate I can edit the post.)
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
More information about the lttng-dev