[lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust] Fix: Unsynchronized access in LTTngTCPSessiondClient
Jérémie Galarneau
jeremie.galarneau at efficios.com
Sat Feb 22 14:15:15 EST 2014
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jérémie Galarneau" <jeremie.galarneau at efficios.com>
>> To: lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
>> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:22:33 AM
>> Subject: [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-ust] Fix: Unsynchronized access in LTTngTCPSessiondClient
>>
>> enabledEventList is shared between the LTTngThread and eventTimer
>> threads but is not synchronized.
>>
>> This patch changes enabledEventList's type from an ArrayList to a
>> synchronizedList which implements the same interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jérémie Galarneau <jeremie.galarneau at efficios.com>
>> ---
>> .../org/lttng/ust/jul/LTTngTCPSessiondClient.java | 15
>> +++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/liblttng-ust-jul/org/lttng/ust/jul/LTTngTCPSessiondClient.java
>> b/liblttng-ust-jul/org/lttng/ust/jul/LTTngTCPSessiondClient.java
>> index 25d1cb2..0d9a485 100644
>> --- a/liblttng-ust-jul/org/lttng/ust/jul/LTTngTCPSessiondClient.java
>> +++ b/liblttng-ust-jul/org/lttng/ust/jul/LTTngTCPSessiondClient.java
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ import java.util.List;
>> import java.util.Timer;
>> import java.util.TimerTask;
>> import java.util.logging.Logger;
>> +import java.util.Collections;
>>
>> class USTRegisterMsg {
>> public static int pid;
>> @@ -57,7 +58,8 @@ public class LTTngTCPSessiondClient {
>> private Semaphore registerSem;
>>
>> private Timer eventTimer;
>> - private List<LTTngEvent> enabledEventList = new ArrayList<LTTngEvent>();
>> + private List<LTTngEvent> enabledEventList = Collections.synchronizedList(
>> + new ArrayList<LTTngEvent>());
>> /*
>> * Map of Logger objects that have been enabled. They are indexed by name.
>> */
>> @@ -86,7 +88,10 @@ public class LTTngTCPSessiondClient {
>> * We have to make a copy here since it is possible that the
>> * enabled event list is changed during an iteration on it.
>> */
>> - List<LTTngEvent> tmpList = new ArrayList<LTTngEvent>(enabledEventList);
>> + List<LTTngEvent> tmpList;
>> + synchronized(enabledEventList) {
>> + tmpList = new ArrayList<LTTngEvent>(enabledEventList);
>> + }
>
>
> Further down in this function, we find:
>
> ret = enableCmd.enableLogger(handler, event, enabledLoggers);
> if (ret == 1) {
> /* Enabled so remove the event from the list. */
> enabledEventList.remove(event);
> }
>
> should we encompass a larger part of this function with synchronize ?
AFAIU, this operation is already synchronized by the synchronizedList class.
> What happens if event is removed from enabledEventList while we iterate on the list copy ?
I'm not sure I understand your concern.
Regards,
Jérémie
>
> Thanks,
>
> MAthieu
>
>
>>
>> LTTngSessiondCmd2_4.sessiond_enable_handler enableCmd = new
>> LTTngSessiondCmd2_4.sessiond_enable_handler();
>> @@ -277,8 +282,10 @@ public class LTTngTCPSessiondClient {
>> * Add the event to the list so it can be enabled if
>> * the logger appears at some point in time.
>> */
>> - if (enabledEventList.contains(event) == false) {
>> - enabledEventList.add(event);
>> + synchronized (enabledEventList) {
>> + if (enabledEventList.contains(event) == false) {
>> + enabledEventList.add(event);
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>> data = enableCmd.getBytes();
>> --
>> 1.9.0
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lttng-dev mailing list
>> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
>> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
>>
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
--
Jérémie Galarneau
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list