[lttng-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Fix: read subbuffer splice signedness issue

Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com
Sat Feb 8 10:51:56 EST 2014



----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Goulet" <dgoulet at efficios.com>
> To: lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 3:42:40 PM
> Subject: [lttng-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Fix: read subbuffer splice signedness issue
> 
> Same issue as the previous fix in the mmap read subbuffer. However, this
> patch keeps looping on the len since splice() does NOT give any
> guarantee that it will splice the full count.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet at efficios.com>
> ---
>  src/common/consumer.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/common/consumer.c b/src/common/consumer.c
> index 59d4366..798e22e 100644
> --- a/src/common/consumer.c
> +++ b/src/common/consumer.c
> @@ -1796,17 +1796,24 @@ ssize_t lttng_consumer_on_read_subbuffer_splice(
>  	}
>  
>  	while (len > 0) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Set the len value to a signed value so the if/else statement can
> +		 * evaluate it against the signed returned value from lttng_write since
> +		 * -1 can be returned indicating a communication failure.
> +		 */
> +		ssize_t signed_len = len;
> +
>  		DBG("splice chan to pipe offset %lu of len %lu (fd : %d, pipe: %d)",
>  				(unsigned long)offset, len, fd, splice_pipe[1]);
>  		ret_splice = splice(fd, &offset, splice_pipe[1], NULL, len,
>  				SPLICE_F_MOVE | SPLICE_F_MORE);
>  		DBG("splice chan to pipe, ret %zd", ret_splice);
> -		if (ret_splice < 0) {
> -			PERROR("Error in relay splice");
> +		if (ret_splice < signed_len) {
> +			ret = errno;
>  			if (written == 0) {
>  				written = ret_splice;
>  			}
> -			ret = errno;
> +			PERROR("Error in relay splice");
>  			goto splice_error;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -1824,6 +1831,8 @@ ssize_t lttng_consumer_on_read_subbuffer_splice(
>  				 * argument to this function.
>  				 */
>  				written -= metadata_payload_size;
> +				/* Take back a signed reference of the updated len. */
> +				signed_len = len;
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> @@ -1831,28 +1840,33 @@ ssize_t lttng_consumer_on_read_subbuffer_splice(
>  		ret_splice = splice(splice_pipe[0], NULL, outfd, NULL,
>  				ret_splice, SPLICE_F_MOVE | SPLICE_F_MORE);
>  		DBG("Consumer splice pipe to file, ret %zd", ret_splice);
> -		if (ret_splice < 0) {
> -			PERROR("Error in file splice");
> +		if (ret_splice < signed_len) {

similar comment than the other patch: we should first check if ret_splice < 0,
and then in the else of that check, we can do a cast and assume that the value
is not negative (because we already tested it).

Thanks,

Mathieu

> +			ret = errno;
>  			if (written == 0) {
>  				written = ret_splice;
>  			}
>  			/* Socket operation failed. We consider the relayd dead */
> -			if (errno == EBADF || errno == EPIPE) {
> +			if (errno == EBADF || errno == EPIPE || errno == ESPIPE) {
>  				WARN("Remote relayd disconnected. Stopping");
>  				relayd_hang_up = 1;
>  				goto write_error;
>  			}
> -			ret = errno;
> +			PERROR("Error in file splice");
>  			goto splice_error;
> -		} else if (ret_splice > len) {
> -			errno = EINVAL;
> -			PERROR("Wrote more data than requested %zd (len: %lu)",
> -					ret_splice, len);
> +		} else if (ret_splice > signed_len) {
> +			/*
> +			 * We don't expect this code path to be executed but you never know
> +			 * so this is an extra protection agains a buggy splice().
> +			 */
>  			written += ret_splice;
>  			ret = errno;
> +			PERROR("Wrote more data than requested %zd (len: %lu)", ret_splice,
> +					len);
>  			goto splice_error;
> +		} else {
> +			/* All good, update current len and continue. */
> +			len -= ret_splice;
>  		}
> -		len -= ret_splice;
>  
>  		/* This call is useless on a socket so better save a syscall. */
>  		if (!relayd) {
> @@ -1865,9 +1879,6 @@ ssize_t lttng_consumer_on_read_subbuffer_splice(
>  		written += ret_splice;
>  	}
>  	lttng_consumer_sync_trace_file(stream, orig_offset);
> -
> -	ret = ret_splice;
> -
>  	goto end;
>  
>  write_error:
> --
> 1.8.5.3
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com



More information about the lttng-dev mailing list