[lttng-dev] [-stable 3.8.1 performance regression] madvise POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED
Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com
Tue Jul 2 09:58:58 EDT 2013
* Dave Chinner (david at fromorbit.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:20:16AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Rob van der Heij (rvdheij at gmail.com) wrote:
> > > Wouldn't you batch the calls to drop the pages from cache rather than drop
> > > one packet at a time?
> >
> > By default for kernel tracing, lttng's trace packets are 1MB, so I
> > consider the call to fadvise to be already batched by applying it to 1MB
> > packets rather than indivitual pages. Even there, it seems that the
> > extra overhead added by the lru drain on each CPU is noticeable.
> >
> > Another reason for not batching this in larger chunks is to limit the
> > impact of the tracer on the kernel page cache. LTTng limits itself to
> > its own set of buffers, and use the page cache for what is absolutely
> > needed to perform I/O, but no more.
>
> I think you are doing it wrong. This is a poster child case for
> using Direct IO and completely avoiding the page cache altogether....
I just tried replacing my sync_file_range()+fadvise() calls and instead
pass the O_DIRECT flag to open(). Unfortunately, I must be doing
something very wrong, because I get only 1/3rd of the throughput, and
the page cache fills up. Any idea why ?
Here are my results:
heavy-syscall.c: 30M sigaction() syscall with bad parameters (returns
immediately). Used as high-throughput stress-test for the tracer.
Tracing to disk with LTTng, all kernel tracepoints activated, including
system calls.
Tracer configuration: per-core buffers split into 4 sub-buffers of
262kB. splice() is used to transfer data from buffers to disk. Runs on a
8-core Intel machine.
Writing to a software raid-1 ext3 partition.
ext3 mount options: rw,errors=remount-ro
* sync_file_range+fadvise 3.9.8
- with lru drain on fadvise
Kernel cache usage:
Before tracing: 56272k cached
After tracing: 56388k cached
939M /root/lttng-traces/auto-20130702-090430
time ./heavy-syscall
real 0m21.910s
throughput: 42MB/s
* sync_file_range+fadvise 3.9.8
- without lru drain on fadvise: manually reverted
Kernel cache usage:
Before tracing: 67968k cached
After tracing: 67984k cached
945M /root/lttng-traces/auto-20130702-092505
time ./heavy-syscall
real 0m21.872s
throughput: 43MB/s
* O_DIRECT 3.9.8
- O_DIRECT flag on open(), removed fadvise and sync_file_range calls
Kernel cache usage:
Before tracing: 99480k cached
After tracing: 360132k cached
258M /root/lttng-traces/auto-20130702-090603
time ./heavy-syscall
real 0m19.627s
throughput: 13MB/s
* No cache hints 3.9.8
- only removed fadvise and sync_file_range calls
Kernel cache usage:
Before tracing: 103556k cached
After tracing: 363712k cached
945M /root/lttng-traces/auto-20130702-092505
time ./heavy-syscall
real 0m19.672s
throughput: 48MB/s
Thoughts ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list