[lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-tools 4/4] Change the metadata hash table node
David Goulet
dgoulet at efficios.com
Mon Oct 15 15:22:42 EDT 2012
Oh forgot to reply :P
Yes... my bad. Present... the patch does what's described :)
David
Mathieu Desnoyers:
> * David Goulet (dgoulet at efficios.com) wrote:
>> Remove the use of the "waitfd_node" for metadata and index the "node" by
>> wait fd during stream allocation only for metadata stream.
>>
>> This was done so the waitfd node could be used later on for the hash
>> table indexing stream by session id the traced data check command (soon
>> to be implemented).
>
> this last changelog paragraph, being using "was" (past) is confusing me.
> Is it what you are now doing (present) or what was there before that you
> are changing ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet at efficios.com>
>> ---
>> src/common/consumer.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/common/consumer.c b/src/common/consumer.c
>> index 1fb9960..0c1a812 100644
>> --- a/src/common/consumer.c
>> +++ b/src/common/consumer.c
>> @@ -172,17 +172,6 @@ void consumer_free_stream(struct rcu_head *head)
>> free(stream);
>> }
>>
>> -static
>> -void consumer_free_metadata_stream(struct rcu_head *head)
>> -{
>> - struct lttng_ht_node_ulong *node =
>> - caa_container_of(head, struct lttng_ht_node_ulong, head);
>> - struct lttng_consumer_stream *stream =
>> - caa_container_of(node, struct lttng_consumer_stream, waitfd_node);
>> -
>> - free(stream);
>> -}
>> -
>> /*
>> * RCU protected relayd socket pair free.
>> */
>> @@ -417,8 +406,17 @@ struct lttng_consumer_stream *consumer_allocate_stream(
>> stream->metadata_flag = metadata_flag;
>> strncpy(stream->path_name, path_name, sizeof(stream->path_name));
>> stream->path_name[sizeof(stream->path_name) - 1] = '\0';
>> - lttng_ht_node_init_ulong(&stream->waitfd_node, stream->wait_fd);
>> - lttng_ht_node_init_ulong(&stream->node, stream->key);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Index differently the metadata node because the thread is using an
>> + * internal hash table to match streams in the metadata_ht to the epoll set
>> + * file descriptor.
>> + */
>> + if (metadata_flag) {
>> + lttng_ht_node_init_ulong(&stream->node, stream->wait_fd);
>> + } else {
>> + lttng_ht_node_init_ulong(&stream->node, stream->key);
>> + }
>>
>> /*
>> * The cpu number is needed before using any ustctl_* actions. Ignored for
>> @@ -1578,11 +1576,11 @@ static void destroy_stream_ht(struct lttng_ht *ht)
>> }
>>
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> - cds_lfht_for_each_entry(ht->ht, &iter.iter, stream, waitfd_node.node) {
>> + cds_lfht_for_each_entry(ht->ht, &iter.iter, stream, node.node) {
>> ret = lttng_ht_del(ht, &iter);
>> assert(!ret);
>>
>> - call_rcu(&stream->waitfd_node.head, consumer_free_metadata_stream);
>> + call_rcu(&stream->node.head, consumer_free_stream);
>> }
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>
>> @@ -1636,7 +1634,7 @@ void consumer_del_metadata_stream(struct lttng_consumer_stream *stream,
>> }
>>
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> - iter.iter.node = &stream->waitfd_node.node;
>> + iter.iter.node = &stream->node.node;
>> ret = lttng_ht_del(ht, &iter);
>> assert(!ret);
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>> @@ -1707,7 +1705,7 @@ end:
>> }
>>
>> free_stream:
>> - call_rcu(&stream->waitfd_node.head, consumer_free_metadata_stream);
>> + call_rcu(&stream->node.head, consumer_free_stream);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -1756,7 +1754,7 @@ static int consumer_add_metadata_stream(struct lttng_consumer_stream *stream,
>> /* Steal stream identifier to avoid having streams with the same key */
>> consumer_steal_stream_key(stream->key, ht);
>>
>> - lttng_ht_add_unique_ulong(ht, &stream->waitfd_node);
>> + lttng_ht_add_unique_ulong(ht, &stream->node);
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>
>> pthread_mutex_unlock(&consumer_data.lock);
>> @@ -1881,7 +1879,7 @@ restart:
>> assert(node);
>>
>> stream = caa_container_of(node, struct lttng_consumer_stream,
>> - waitfd_node);
>> + node);
>>
>> /* Check for error event */
>> if (revents & (LPOLLERR | LPOLLHUP)) {
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lttng-dev mailing list
>> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
>> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
>
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list