[lttng-dev] Enable/disable TPs per executing process
David Goulet
dgoulet at efficios.com
Mon Mar 5 11:22:27 EST 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stanislav,
On 12-03-05 04:52 AM, Stanislav Vovk wrote:
> Hi
>
> In my case LTTng will collect TPs from a number of running processes. I would
> like to enable/disable tracepoints per process. For example, two processes p1 &
> p2 running and there exist a tracepoint called INFO which is used in both p1 and
> p2. I would like to enable INFO for p1 only. So later, looking at my traces I
> should only see INFO triggered by p1 and nothing from p2. Is there a way to do
> like that?
At this point in time, this feature is not implemented yet. The per-pid tracing
is on the roadmap for future release.
>
> I was thinking to enable one channel per process and and then I could
> enable/disable tracepoints per channel. Can a channel be associated with a process?
>
A channel can not be associated with a process. However, you can enable only
tracepoints of a process in one channel and the other process in a second
channel. Disabling one channel will only give you the tracepoints of a process.
You can also add the "vpid" context information to the channel or/and events and
with that you'll be able to pin an event to a precise PID. (Note, if context is
added to the channel, it's also enabled for events registered in that channel).
$ lttng add-context -t vpid -u -e EVENT_NAME
(or -c CHANNEL_NAME)
> In LTTng control API I found a following function,
>
> /*
> * Set the tracing group for the *current* flow of execution.
> *
> * On success, returns 0, on error, returns -1 (null name) or -ENOMEM.
> */
> extern int lttng_set_tracing_group(const char *name);
>
> I dont really understand how and where I can use these tracing groups? Is this
> something that I can use in the above scenario?
Users in the tracing group are able to trace the kernel without root access.
This API call allows you to set the group name *if* it is different from the
default one ("tracing") only for the execution you are using the liblttng-ctl.
For your use case, user space tracing, no need at all :).
Cheers!
David
>
> Thanks!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPVOhAAAoJEELoaioR9I02eg0H/iDRDZvb+t5wdN5lcPlurgRU
dapATGDsnzX9LoOhuaqkBb3lDAvDfIkUGrpo7ZSJNykKjnTotF/X9HqlB1p09tQU
bnqsnxhv7YQTg6U1cuGGub+ERGUZoQkPReRXEvPfys3jUEgYsJHW/vamrodYGBYA
QymnYnveO3jAIB2istEGTCsuX7nothNQX7wCTkS6VBByc8PQE4vC6UyrwmAxOQ1A
33fGIxdsmX27MosVHXrxHX2nv9G4Kk2TP91f6QbRpbOq9pDx37qFYliTrn4WRsGs
lXc/nrzVt+iL8Lo8A011SFYHOhPiAiba2jHNtNQIT8iFha5NbQa6tX7OPdPxFAw=
=fbD/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list