[lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-tools] Fix: health check and time
Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com
Mon Jul 23 15:12:05 EDT 2012
I notice that currently, the health check code does not have a notion of
"time flow": therefore, two consecutive calls to lttng_health_check()
might end up returning a bad state (0) just because there was too little
time between the invocations.
However, the lttng.h documentation states:
/*
* Check session daemon health for a specific component.
*
* Return 0 if health is OK or 1 if BAD. A returned value of -1 indicate that
* the control library was not able to connect to the session daemon health
* socket.
*
* Any other positive value is an lttcomm error which can be translate with
* lttng_strerror().
*/
extern int lttng_health_check(enum lttng_health_component c);
Therefore, the user would expect that handling the time flow in between
the invocation is dealth with internally, which is what I remember we
agreed on.
So we would need to add some time information to the "last" snapshot, so
we can do a time delta between the current and last snapshot to figure
out if we need to report the thread as stalled or not.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
CC: David Goulet <dgoulet at efficios.com>
---
diff --git a/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/health.c b/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/health.c
index d7d25cf..cbda651 100644
--- a/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/health.c
+++ b/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/health.c
@@ -20,12 +20,58 @@
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <time.h>
#include <common/error.h>
#include "health.h"
/*
+ * If a thread stalls for this amount of time, it will be considered
+ * bogus (bad health).
+ */
+#define HEALTH_CHECK_DELTA_S 20
+#define HEALTH_CHECK_DELTA_NS 0
+
+static const struct timespec time_delta = {
+ .tv_sec = HEALTH_CHECK_DELTA_S,
+ .tv_nsec = HEALTH_CHECK_DELTA_NS,
+};
+
+static
+void time_diff(const struct timespec *time_a, const struct timespec *time_b,
+ struct timespec *res)
+{
+ if (time_a->tv_nsec - time_b->tv_nsec < 0) {
+ res->tv_sec = time_a->tv_sec - time_b->tv_sec - 1;
+ res->tv_nsec = 1000000000L + time_a->tv_sec - time_b->tv_sec;
+ } else {
+ res->tv_sec = time_a->tv_sec - time_b->tv_sec;
+ res->tv_nsec = time_a->tv_sec - time_b->tv_sec;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Return true if time_a - time_b > diff, else false.
+ */
+static
+int time_diff_gt(const struct timespec *time_a, const struct timespec *time_b,
+ const struct timespec *diff)
+{
+ struct timespec res;
+
+ time_diff(time_a, time_b, &res);
+ time_diff(&res, diff, &res);
+ if (res.tv_sec > 0) {
+ return 1;
+ }
+ if (res.tv_sec == 0 && res.tv_nsec > 0) {
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
* Check health of a specific health state counter.
*
* Return 0 if health is bad or else 1.
@@ -33,28 +79,55 @@
int health_check_state(struct health_state *state)
{
unsigned long current, last;
- int ret = 1;
+ struct timespec current_time;
+ int retval = 1, ret;
assert(state);
last = state->last;
current = uatomic_read(&state->current);
+ ret = clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ¤t_time);
+ if (ret) {
+ PERROR("Error reading time\n");
+ /* error */
+ retval = 0;
+ goto end;
+ }
/*
- * Here are the conditions for a bad health. Either flag
- * HEALTH_ERROR is set, or the progress counter is the same as
- * the last one and we are NOT waiting for a poll() call.
+ * Thread is in are in bad health if flag HEALTH_ERROR is set. It
+ * is also in bad health if, after the delta delay has passed,
+ * its the progress counter has not moved and it has NOT been
+ * waiting for a poll() call.
*/
- if ((uatomic_read(&state->flags) & HEALTH_ERROR)
- || (current == last && !HEALTH_IS_IN_POLL(current))) {
- /* error */
- ret = 0;
+ if (uatomic_read(&state->flags) & HEALTH_ERROR) {
+ retval = 0;
+ goto end;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Initial condition need to update the last counter and sample
+ * time, but should not check health in this initial case,
+ * because we don't know how much time has passed.
+ */
+ if (state->last_time.tv_sec == 0 && state->last_time.tv_nsec == 0) {
+ /* update last counter and last sample time */
+ state->last = current;
+ memcpy(&state->last_time, ¤t_time, sizeof(current_time));
+ } else {
+ if (time_diff_gt(¤t_time, &state->last_time, &time_delta)) {
+ if (current == last && !HEALTH_IS_IN_POLL(current)) {
+ /* error */
+ retval = 0;
+ }
+ /* update last counter and last sample time */
+ state->last = current;
+ memcpy(&state->last_time, ¤t_time, sizeof(current_time));
+ }
}
+end:
DBG("Health state current %" PRIu64 ", last %" PRIu64 ", ret %d",
current, last, ret);
-
- /* update last counter */
- state->last = current;
- return ret;
+ return retval;
}
diff --git a/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/health.h b/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/health.h
index b268860..8f19fe8 100644
--- a/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/health.h
+++ b/src/bin/lttng-sessiond/health.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <stdint.h>
#include <urcu/uatomic.h>
+#include <time.h>
/*
* These are the value added to the current state depending of the position in
@@ -37,10 +38,12 @@ enum health_flags {
struct health_state {
/*
- * last counter is only read and updated by the health_check
- * thread (single updater).
+ * last counter and last_time are only read and updated by the
+ * health_check thread (single updater).
*/
unsigned long last;
+ struct timespec last_time;
+
/*
* current and flags are updated by multiple threads concurrently.
*/
@@ -104,7 +107,9 @@ static inline void health_error(struct health_state *state)
static inline void health_init(struct health_state *state)
{
assert(state);
- uatomic_set(&state->last, 0);
+ state->last = 0;
+ state->last_time.tv_sec = 0;
+ state->last_time.tv_nsec = 0;
uatomic_set(&state->current, 0);
uatomic_set(&state->flags, 0);
}
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list