[lttng-dev] LTTng
Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com
Fri Jul 20 13:02:33 EDT 2012
One small detail to keep in mind at this point: only the "discard" and
"overwrite" modes are implemented for handling buffer condition. If you
need to ensure that events are _never_ discarded, even with
high-throughput scenarios, we might need to implement a "blocking" mode,
which makes the application wait until there is space free in the buffer
before it continues. It would probably make more sense for logging.
Other than this detail, LTTng-UST would be a good fit for low-overhead
logging.
Thanks,
Mathieu
* Alawneh, Luay (Luay.Alawneh at nuance.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am reading about LTTng and I would like to know if it can replace Log4c for logging user space events in the production environment. In addition to the method enter/exit events we also use Log4c to log many other events to indicate errors and other useful information.
>
> To summarize, I would like to know if LTTng can be used in a production environment for logging different types of events. We are planning to replace Log4c with another logging framework to improve the performance by reducing the time spent in logging.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Luay Alawneh
> Nuance Communications
>
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list