[lttng-dev] [lttng-tools PATCH] lttng-tools python module

[David Goulet]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I agree with that.

The main reason for extras/ is the fact that, for now, this lib would not be
supported meaning that if liblttng-ctl changes, these bindings will NOT follow
it unless someone submit a patch. If we decide at some point to fully support
it, I have no problem seeing it in src/

Cheers!
David

On 01/08/12 11:13 AM, Christian Babeux wrote:
>> - From my point of view, I'm not sure it is, for now, a good idea since
>> it adds a considerable amount work to fully support (at least on my side)
>> a library that is an extra functionality and for that I see this in
>> extras/ for now.
> 
> +1 for extras. I suggest extras/bindings/swig/python. The Apache Subversion
> project has a similar tree [1].
> 
> Christian
> 
> [1] -
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQGVMWAAoJEELoaioR9I02m7gH/2cnsQ4x4fmdmKKy422l7e9c
8mzsgkWR2NsJHF7d0E7lvg0Be8nsxq59FD0xvN1jqoh4I+aeMt+0Ulz/Z4Gr6c3U
gXLRjDPGyIrkGdL/bFase6WZQKHtvI+6sDIgxDj0TbSjeZ0YOOaAASP6eFTOaWF1
DhyJBtkIIVb8pjU8dYMMWFSkFhlGpCYDangnx09OSY15+AiLQIYd1HJdZoDHwfjP
M9V3cPEqvDFmc4H0qkgX4g5ACN8XlvSN2TZGimDo7KP8qMSRtBxTEy8GrOwXMi+O
pdNVu1gk+f0tAwTFCPGSAXFCv2/B4/wDnBTvu/m06p/NB5sihsskdv3rXK3o4DQ=
=VL+7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----