[ltt-dev] [PATCH 6/7] urcu, call_rcu: Cleanup call_rcu_data pointers before used in child

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com) wrote:
> * Lai Jiangshan (laijs at cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs at cn.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >  urcu-call-rcu-impl.h |    6 ++++++
> >  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h b/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h
> > index 65c1c7a..3c68ae7 100644
> > --- a/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h
> > +++ b/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h
> > @@ -686,6 +686,12 @@ void call_rcu_after_fork_child(void)
> >  	default_call_rcu_data = NULL;
> >  	(void)get_default_call_rcu_data();
> 
> We should probably free the old default_call_rcu_data before ? and
> remove it from the call_rcu_data_list ? What about the cds queues
> content ?
> 
> >  
> > +	/* Cleanup call_rcu_data pointers before used */
> > +	maxcpus = 0;
> > +	free(per_cpu_call_rcu_data);
> 
> Shouldn't we clean the cds queues and remove it from call_rcu_data_list
> too ?
> 
> > +	per_cpu_call_rcu_data = NULL;
> > +	thread_call_rcu_data = NULL;
> 
> Same question applies to thread_call_rcu_data.

Forget it, I see the 

        /* Dispose of all of the rest of the call_rcu_data structures. */
        cds_list_for_each_entry_safe(crdp, next, &call_rcu_data_list, list) {

iteration that follows. It takes care of my concerns.

Thanks,

Mathieu


> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mathieu
> 
> > +
> >  	/* Dispose of all of the rest of the call_rcu_data structures. */
> >  	cds_list_for_each_entry_safe(crdp, next, &call_rcu_data_list, list) {
> >  		if (crdp == default_call_rcu_data)
> > -- 
> > 1.7.4.4
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com