[ltt-dev] [URCU PATCH v3 2/2] cmm: do not generate code for smp_rmb/smp_wmb on x86_64, smp_rmb on i686
Mathieu Desnoyers
compudj at krystal.dyndns.org
Tue Sep 6 18:08:04 EDT 2011
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini at redhat.com) wrote:
> Usually we can assume no accesses to write-combining memory occur,
> and also that there are no non-temporal load/stores (people would presumably
> write those with assembly or intrinsics and put appropriate lfence/sfence
> manually). In this case rmb and wmb are no-ops on x86. Define cmm_smp_rmb
> and cmm_smp_wmb to be the "common" operations, while leaving cmm_rmb
> and cmm_wmb in place for more sophisticated uses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>
> ---
> urcu/arch/x86.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/urcu/arch/x86.h b/urcu/arch/x86.h
> index 9e5411f..69f0416 100644
> --- a/urcu/arch/x86.h
> +++ b/urcu/arch/x86.h
> @@ -33,13 +33,30 @@ extern "C" {
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_HAVE_FENCE
> #define cmm_mb() asm volatile("mfence":::"memory")
> +
> +/*
> + * Define cmm_rmb/cmm_wmb to "strict" barriers that may be needed when
> + * using SSE or working with I/O areas. cmm_smp_rmb/cmm_smp_wmb are
> + * only compiler barriers, which is enough for general use.
> + */
> #define cmm_rmb() asm volatile("lfence":::"memory")
> #define cmm_wmb() asm volatile("sfence"::: "memory")
> +
> +/*
> + * An empty cmm_smp_rmb() may not be enough on old PentiumPro multiprocessor
> + * systems, due to an erratum. The Linux kernel says that "Even distro
> + * kernels should think twice before enabling this", but for now let's
> + * be conservative and leave the full barrier on 32-bit processors.
> + */
> +#define cmm_smp_rmb() cmm_barrier()
This comment does not match the #if /#else branch of the code it
discusses. It should be moved to the #else branch.
> +
> +/*
> + * IDT WinChip supports weak store ordering, and the kernel may enable it
> + * under our feet; cmm_smp_wmb() ceases to be a nop for these processors.
> + * However, this never happens on any processor that has *fence instructions.
Same for the comment about IDT WinChip.
Thanks!
Mathieu
> + */
> +#define cmm_smp_wmb() cmm_barrier()
> #else
> -/*
> - * Some non-Intel clones support out of order store. cmm_wmb() ceases to be a
> - * nop for these.
> - */
> #define cmm_mb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)":::"memory")
> #define cmm_rmb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)":::"memory")
> #define cmm_wmb() asm volatile("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)"::: "memory")
> --
> 1.7.6
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list