[ltt-dev] [PATCH 2/6] rculfhash: Fix ht lazy grow logic.
Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com
Wed Nov 2 11:13:38 EDT 2011
* Lai Jiangshan (laijs at cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> On 11/02/2011 01:00 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Lai Jiangshan (laijs at cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> >> "size < target_size" in cds_lfht_resize_lazy() which is always true
> >> confuses me.
> >
> > I think it can be false sometimes if we have multiple concurrent calls
> > to cds_lfht_resize_lazy. If the first call succeeds, the resize happens,
> > and then a second call gets to try the resize again, but the table
> > already has grown. In this case, the resize work does not need to be
> > executed.
>
>
> size is stack local variable, and target_size is (size << growth) or
> larger(concurrent calls to cds_lfht_resize_lazy),
>
> so "size < target_size" is always true.
Good point. Will looking into the patch again.
Thanks!
Mathieu
>
> >
> > The resize_initiated flag is just a hint telling if a resize is in
> > progress (so we don't trigger extra resize work when unnecessary), but
> > it is not sampled before the RCU reads are performed -- only the "size"
> > is read with rcu_dereference, which ensures that we can use this size
> > information to confirm that the chain length that we read _after_ the
> > rcu_dereference actually apply to a size we really want to update. The
> > resize_initiated flag does not provide this guarantee.
> >
> >>
> >> I think we should grow the ht only when we success to increase
> >> the resize_target.
> >
> > I agree on this second change.
> >
> > Can you respin this patch leaving the ""size < target_size" in place ?
>
> See above.
>
> Thanks,
> Lai
>
> >
> > You can add my comments above as documentation of cds_lfht_resize_lazy()
> > if you want.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mathieu
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs at cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> ---
> >> rculfhash.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
> >> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/rculfhash.c b/rculfhash.c
> >> index da37e97..e97d854 100644
> >> --- a/rculfhash.c
> >> +++ b/rculfhash.c
> >> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ int get_count_order_ulong(unsigned long x)
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> static
> >> -void cds_lfht_resize_lazy(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, int growth);
> >> +void cds_lfht_resize_lazy_grow(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, int growth);
> >>
> >> static
> >> void cds_lfht_resize_lazy_count(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size,
> >> @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void check_resize(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, uint32_t chain_len)
> >> dbg_printf("WARNING: large chain length: %u.\n",
> >> chain_len);
> >> if (chain_len >= CHAIN_LEN_RESIZE_THRESHOLD)
> >> - cds_lfht_resize_lazy(ht, size,
> >> + cds_lfht_resize_lazy_grow(ht, size,
> >> get_count_order_u32(chain_len - (CHAIN_LEN_TARGET - 1)));
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -706,7 +706,8 @@ int is_end(struct cds_lfht_node *node)
> >> }
> >>
> >> static
> >> -unsigned long _uatomic_max(unsigned long *ptr, unsigned long v)
> >> +unsigned long _uatomic_xchg_monotonic_increase(unsigned long *ptr,
> >> + unsigned long v)
> >> {
> >> unsigned long old1, old2;
> >>
> >> @@ -716,7 +717,7 @@ unsigned long _uatomic_max(unsigned long *ptr, unsigned long v)
> >> if (old2 >= v)
> >> return old2;
> >> } while ((old1 = uatomic_cmpxchg(ptr, old2, v)) != old2);
> >> - return v;
> >> + return old2;
> >> }
> >>
> >> static
> >> @@ -1716,11 +1717,9 @@ void _do_cds_lfht_resize(struct cds_lfht *ht)
> >> }
> >>
> >> static
> >> -unsigned long resize_target_update(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size,
> >> - int growth_order)
> >> +unsigned long resize_target_grow(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long new_size)
> >> {
> >> - return _uatomic_max(&ht->t.resize_target,
> >> - size << growth_order);
> >> + return _uatomic_xchg_monotonic_increase(&ht->t.resize_target, new_size);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static
> >> @@ -1760,15 +1759,17 @@ void do_resize_cb(struct rcu_head *head)
> >> }
> >>
> >> static
> >> -void cds_lfht_resize_lazy(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, int growth)
> >> +void cds_lfht_resize_lazy_grow(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, int growth)
> >> {
> >> struct rcu_resize_work *work;
> >> - unsigned long target_size;
> >> + unsigned long target_size = size << growth;
> >> +
> >> + if (resize_target_grow(ht, target_size) >= target_size)
> >> + return;
> >>
> >> - target_size = resize_target_update(ht, size, growth);
> >> /* Store resize_target before read resize_initiated */
> >> cmm_smp_mb();
> >> - if (!CMM_LOAD_SHARED(ht->t.resize_initiated) && size < target_size) {
> >> + if (!CMM_LOAD_SHARED(ht->t.resize_initiated)) {
> >> uatomic_inc(&ht->in_progress_resize);
> >> cmm_smp_mb(); /* increment resize count before load destroy */
> >> if (CMM_LOAD_SHARED(ht->in_progress_destroy)) {
> >> --
> >> 1.7.4.4
> >>
> >
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list