[ltt-dev] [PATCH 2/6] rculfhash: Fix ht lazy grow logic.

Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com
Wed Nov 2 11:13:38 EDT 2011


* Lai Jiangshan (laijs at cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> On 11/02/2011 01:00 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Lai Jiangshan (laijs at cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> >> "size < target_size" in cds_lfht_resize_lazy() which is always true
> >> confuses me.
> > 
> > I think it can be false sometimes if we have multiple concurrent calls
> > to cds_lfht_resize_lazy. If the first call succeeds, the resize happens,
> > and then a second call gets to try the resize again, but the table
> > already has grown. In this case, the resize work does not need to be
> > executed.
> 
> 
> size is stack local variable, and target_size is (size << growth) or
> larger(concurrent calls to cds_lfht_resize_lazy),
> 
> so "size < target_size" is always true.

Good point. Will looking into the patch again.

Thanks!

Mathieu

> 
> > 
> > The resize_initiated flag is just a hint telling if a resize is in
> > progress (so we don't trigger extra resize work when unnecessary), but
> > it is not sampled before the RCU reads are performed -- only the "size"
> > is read with rcu_dereference, which ensures that we can use this size
> > information to confirm that the chain length that we read _after_ the
> > rcu_dereference actually apply to a size we really want to update. The
> > resize_initiated flag does not provide this guarantee.
> > 
> >>
> >> I think we should grow the ht only when we success to increase
> >> the resize_target.
> > 
> > I agree on this second change.
> > 
> > Can you respin this patch leaving the ""size < target_size" in place ?
> 
> See above.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lai
> 
> > 
> > You can add my comments above as documentation of cds_lfht_resize_lazy()
> > if you want.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Mathieu
> > 
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs at cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> ---
> >>  rculfhash.c |   25 +++++++++++++------------
> >>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/rculfhash.c b/rculfhash.c
> >> index da37e97..e97d854 100644
> >> --- a/rculfhash.c
> >> +++ b/rculfhash.c
> >> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ int get_count_order_ulong(unsigned long x)
> >>  #endif
> >>  
> >>  static
> >> -void cds_lfht_resize_lazy(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, int growth);
> >> +void cds_lfht_resize_lazy_grow(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, int growth);
> >>  
> >>  static
> >>  void cds_lfht_resize_lazy_count(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size,
> >> @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void check_resize(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, uint32_t chain_len)
> >>  		dbg_printf("WARNING: large chain length: %u.\n",
> >>  			   chain_len);
> >>  	if (chain_len >= CHAIN_LEN_RESIZE_THRESHOLD)
> >> -		cds_lfht_resize_lazy(ht, size,
> >> +		cds_lfht_resize_lazy_grow(ht, size,
> >>  			get_count_order_u32(chain_len - (CHAIN_LEN_TARGET - 1)));
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> @@ -706,7 +706,8 @@ int is_end(struct cds_lfht_node *node)
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static
> >> -unsigned long _uatomic_max(unsigned long *ptr, unsigned long v)
> >> +unsigned long _uatomic_xchg_monotonic_increase(unsigned long *ptr,
> >> +		unsigned long v)
> >>  {
> >>  	unsigned long old1, old2;
> >>  
> >> @@ -716,7 +717,7 @@ unsigned long _uatomic_max(unsigned long *ptr, unsigned long v)
> >>  		if (old2 >= v)
> >>  			return old2;
> >>  	} while ((old1 = uatomic_cmpxchg(ptr, old2, v)) != old2);
> >> -	return v;
> >> +	return old2;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static
> >> @@ -1716,11 +1717,9 @@ void _do_cds_lfht_resize(struct cds_lfht *ht)
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static
> >> -unsigned long resize_target_update(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size,
> >> -				   int growth_order)
> >> +unsigned long resize_target_grow(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long new_size)
> >>  {
> >> -	return _uatomic_max(&ht->t.resize_target,
> >> -			    size << growth_order);
> >> +	return _uatomic_xchg_monotonic_increase(&ht->t.resize_target, new_size);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static
> >> @@ -1760,15 +1759,17 @@ void do_resize_cb(struct rcu_head *head)
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static
> >> -void cds_lfht_resize_lazy(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, int growth)
> >> +void cds_lfht_resize_lazy_grow(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, int growth)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct rcu_resize_work *work;
> >> -	unsigned long target_size;
> >> +	unsigned long target_size = size << growth;
> >> +
> >> +	if (resize_target_grow(ht, target_size) >= target_size)
> >> +		return;
> >>  
> >> -	target_size = resize_target_update(ht, size, growth);
> >>  	/* Store resize_target before read resize_initiated */
> >>  	cmm_smp_mb();
> >> -	if (!CMM_LOAD_SHARED(ht->t.resize_initiated) && size < target_size) {
> >> +	if (!CMM_LOAD_SHARED(ht->t.resize_initiated)) {
> >>  		uatomic_inc(&ht->in_progress_resize);
> >>  		cmm_smp_mb();	/* increment resize count before load destroy */
> >>  		if (CMM_LOAD_SHARED(ht->in_progress_destroy)) {
> >> -- 
> >> 1.7.4.4
> >>
> > 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com




More information about the lttng-dev mailing list