[ltt-dev] Trying to compile lttng-tools

[Bernd Hufmann]

Hello Daniel

I've recently contributed a LTTng Trace Control solution to the Eclipse 
LTTng Integration which is part of the Eclipse linuxtools project (See 
also bugzilla bug 343438). This LTTng Trace Control solution in Eclipse 
is based on TCF and connects to the lttng-agent. I used the last working 
lttng-agent from last February to verify the design. Once we receive a 
new version of the lttng-agent, the LTTng Trace Control in Eclipse will 
be updated.

The contribution was made to the linuxtools GIT repository and it's 
available on HEAD of the master branch. The User Guide for LTTng 
Integration in Eclipse has been also updated to reflect the LTTng Trace 
Control. Here is the link: 
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Linux_Tools_Project/LTTng/User_Guide.

To install this solution in Eclipse you require an Indigo Eclipse 
installation (version 3.7) and the TCF plug-ins from CDT for the indigo 
release . You can use the update site 
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/cdt/updates/indigo to get TCF. For 
some unknown reason, the nightly builds of linuxtools for the Indigo 
release haven't been updated recently. For now, you will need to 
checkout the source code (from HEAD) of the LTTng Integration in Eclipse 
to get the LTTng Trace Control.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best Regards
Bernd


On 05/05/2011 02:19 PM, Daniel U. Thibault wrote:
> David Goulet<david.goulet<at>  polymtl.ca>  writes:
>
>>>> But, for now, you can fix that quickly by changing this to
>>>> "libustctl/Makefile.am" from the git source of ust.
>>>>
>>>> -       $(top_builddir)/libustcomm/libustcomm.la
>>>> +       $(top_builddir)/libustcomm/libustcomm.la \
>>>> +       $(top_builddir)/snprintf/libustsnprintf.la
>>>>
>>>> Recompile and install ust and should be fine :)
>     Unfortunately, I still get the same configure results for lttng-tools once
> ust is recompiled and re-installed.
>
>> Actually, there is no "compatible commit" at this time for lttng-tools
>> and UST. This is why there is no release yet of lttng-tools. It is still
>> in very active development and should NOT be use in production yet.
>     Okay, I'll put it on ice then.
>
>>> I guess what I really need to know is what is the most recent *coherent*
>>> set of commits from git.dorsal.polymtl.ca and git.lttng.org?
>> git.lttng.org for everything! The dorsal git is for internal development
>> and nothing "really" public.
>     git.lttng.org for everything...except for lttng-tools, right?
>
>     Since I'm focusing on getting Eclipse LTTng working over TCF, any
> recommendations as to which git.lttng.org set of releases/commits to use?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev