[ltt-dev] [rp] [URCU RFC patch 2/3] call_rcu: use futex for wakeup scheme
Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com
Tue Jun 7 00:16:27 EDT 2011
* Paul E. McKenney (paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:46:00PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > If I remove the URCU_CALL_RCU_RT flag from the rbtree single writer
> > test, thus using the pthread_cond_signal mechanism, there is a huge
> > slowdown: without cpu affinity for the worker threads, it crawls to 129
> > updates/s (looks like mutex contention between the thread calling
> > call_rcu and the call_rcu thread). Adding CPU affinity to the per-cpu
> > call_rcu threads, I get 546 updates/s, which is slightly better (better
> > cache locality, and maybe the mutex contention is not as bad thanks to
> > the two threads sharing the same CPU).
> >
> > So I decided to try replacing pthread_cond_wait/signal with my
> > futex-based implementation I use for the rest of the urcu lib: it has
> > the advantage of removing the mutex from the call_rcu() execution
> > entirely, sampling the "futex" variable without any mutex whatsoever for
> > the case where no wakeup is needed.
> >
> > Disabling URCU_CALL_RCU_RT flag, with per-cpu affined call_rcu threads,
> > with my futex-based wakeup implementation, I get 55754 updates/s (even
> > better than with URCU_CALL_RCU_RT flag!).
>
> Assuming that compat_futex.c handles the non-Linux case, works for me!
OK, patch merged. Thanks!
Mathieu
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
> > ---
> > urcu-call-rcu-impl.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: userspace-rcu/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- userspace-rcu.orig/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h
> > +++ userspace-rcu/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h
> > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > #include "urcu-call-rcu.h"
> > #include "urcu-pointer.h"
> > #include "urcu/list.h"
> > +#include "urcu/urcu-futex.h"
> >
> > /* Data structure that identifies a call_rcu thread. */
> >
> > @@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ struct call_rcu_data {
> > struct cds_wfq_queue cbs;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > pthread_mutex_t mtx;
> > - pthread_cond_t cond;
> > + int futex;
> > unsigned long qlen;
> > pthread_t tid;
> > int cpu_affinity;
> > @@ -88,6 +89,26 @@ static struct call_rcu_data *default_cal
> > static struct call_rcu_data **per_cpu_call_rcu_data;
> > static long maxcpus;
> >
> > +static void call_rcu_wait(struct call_rcu_data *crdp)
> > +{
> > + /* Read call_rcu list before read futex */
> > + cmm_smp_mb();
> > + if (uatomic_read(&crdp->futex) == -1)
> > + futex_async(&crdp->futex, FUTEX_WAIT, -1,
> > + NULL, NULL, 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void call_rcu_wake_up(struct call_rcu_data *crdp)
> > +{
> > + /* Write to call_rcu list before reading/writing futex */
> > + cmm_smp_mb();
> > + if (unlikely(uatomic_read(&crdp->futex) == -1)) {
> > + uatomic_set(&crdp->futex, 0);
> > + futex_async(&crdp->futex, FUTEX_WAKE, 1,
> > + NULL, NULL, 0);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > /* Allocate the array if it has not already been allocated. */
> >
> > static void alloc_cpu_call_rcu_data(void)
> > @@ -219,19 +240,9 @@ static void *call_rcu_thread(void *arg)
> > if (crdp->flags & URCU_CALL_RCU_RT)
> > poll(NULL, 0, 10);
> > else {
> > - call_rcu_lock(&crdp->mtx);
> > - _CMM_STORE_SHARED(crdp->flags,
> > - crdp->flags & ~URCU_CALL_RCU_RUNNING);
> > - if (&crdp->cbs.head ==
> > - _CMM_LOAD_SHARED(crdp->cbs.tail) &&
> > - pthread_cond_wait(&crdp->cond, &crdp->mtx) != 0) {
> > - perror("pthread_cond_wait");
> > - exit(-1);
> > - }
> > - _CMM_STORE_SHARED(crdp->flags,
> > - crdp->flags | URCU_CALL_RCU_RUNNING);
> > + if (&crdp->cbs.head == _CMM_LOAD_SHARED(crdp->cbs.tail))
> > + call_rcu_wait(crdp);
> > poll(NULL, 0, 10);
> > - call_rcu_unlock(&crdp->mtx);
> > }
> > }
> > call_rcu_lock(&crdp->mtx);
> > @@ -264,11 +275,8 @@ static void call_rcu_data_init(struct ca
> > perror("pthread_mutex_init");
> > exit(-1);
> > }
> > - if (pthread_cond_init(&crdp->cond, NULL) != 0) {
> > - perror("pthread_cond_init");
> > - exit(-1);
> > - }
> > - crdp->flags = flags | URCU_CALL_RCU_RUNNING;
> > + crdp->futex = 0;
> > + crdp->flags = flags;
> > cds_list_add(&crdp->list, &call_rcu_data_list);
> > crdp->cpu_affinity = cpu_affinity;
> > cmm_smp_mb(); /* Structure initialized before pointer is planted. */
> > @@ -492,16 +500,8 @@ int create_all_cpu_call_rcu_data(unsigne
> > */
> > static void wake_call_rcu_thread(struct call_rcu_data *crdp)
> > {
> > - if (!(_CMM_LOAD_SHARED(crdp->flags) & URCU_CALL_RCU_RT)) {
> > - call_rcu_lock(&crdp->mtx);
> > - if (!(_CMM_LOAD_SHARED(crdp->flags) & URCU_CALL_RCU_RUNNING)) {
> > - if (pthread_cond_signal(&crdp->cond) != 0) {
> > - perror("pthread_cond_signal");
> > - exit(-1);
> > - }
> > - }
> > - call_rcu_unlock(&crdp->mtx);
> > - }
> > + if (!(_CMM_LOAD_SHARED(crdp->flags) & URCU_CALL_RCU_RT))
> > + call_rcu_wake_up(crdp);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rp mailing list
> > rp at svcs.cs.pdx.edu
> > http://svcs.cs.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/rp
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list