[ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] Make the error handling in open_channel more readable
Yannick Brosseau
yannick.brosseau at gmail.com
Tue Feb 22 23:13:10 EST 2011
On 2011-02-22 23:06, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Yannick Brosseau (yannick.brosseau at gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yannick Brosseau <yannick.brosseau at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> libust/buffers.c | 9 ++++-----
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libust/buffers.c b/libust/buffers.c
>> index 4e8004c..534d0ef 100644
>> --- a/libust/buffers.c
>> +++ b/libust/buffers.c
>> @@ -319,12 +319,11 @@ static int open_channel(struct ust_channel *chan, size_t subbuf_size,
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> - /* Jump directly inside the loop to close the buffers that were already
>> - * opened. */
>> - for(; i>=0; i--) {
>> - close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
>> error:
>> - do {} while(0);
>> + /* Loop through the opened buffers and close them. Skip the current i,
>> + since it's the one that did not open. */
>> + for(i--; i>=0; i--) {
>> + close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
>>
> Not sure I see how this is more readable. You seem to be changing the
> code behavior too.
>
At least we don't have a jump un the middle of a loop and a complex nop
operation.
The behavior is the same.
We could also not reuse the i and loop from 0 to i-1.
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list