[ltt-dev] [RFC] URCU concurrent data structure API

Paolo Bonzini pbonzini at redhat.com
Wed Aug 17 14:12:30 EDT 2011

On 08/17/2011 09:40 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> There are probably others, but I think it gives an idea of the main
> scenarios I consider. I start to like (3) more and more, and I'm tempted
> to move to it, but I would really like feedback on this API matter
> before I take any decision.

I also think (3) is the ugliest, but also the only really practical choice.

Shipping it as a .c file rather than a library (like gnulib) might also 
be a good way.  Churn in this kind of code is actually a bad thing.


More information about the lttng-dev mailing list