[ltt-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/7] priority-boost urcu

Paolo Bonzini pbonzini at redhat.com
Wed Aug 17 13:08:04 EDT 2011

On 08/17/2011 07:31 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> So I guess that in that sense, synchronize_rcu() of MB and QSBR could be
> merged, is that what you are trying to get at ? (sorry for being slow on
> the uptake);-)

Yes, and perhaps MEMBARRIER too---leaving just SIGNAL as the oddball 
one.  That's also why I started doing the futex optimization in QSBR.

Did you measure SIGNAL to have better performance in practice than MB?


More information about the lttng-dev mailing list