[ltt-dev] [RFC PATCH 4/7] urcu:implement URCU_WAIT_READER
Paul E. McKenney
paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Aug 16 15:20:08 EDT 2011
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:58:07PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> synchronize_rcu() find out ongoing readers and wait for them
Cute!
But some questions and spelling nits below.
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs at cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> urcu.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> urcu/static/urcu.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/urcu.c b/urcu.c
> index bd54467..c13be67 100644
> --- a/urcu.c
> +++ b/urcu.c
> @@ -419,6 +419,53 @@ static void urcu_sync_unlock_if_not_proxy_unlocked(int32_t *lock, int32_t self)
> urcu_sync_slow_unlock(lock);
> }
>
> +/* also implies mb() */
> +void __urcu_read_unlock_specail(void)
s/__urcu_read_unlock_specail/__urcu_read_unlock_special/, please.
> +{
> + urcu_sync_unlock_if_not_proxy_unlocked(&rcu_reader.sync,
> + rcu_reader.tid);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * synchronize_rcu rcu_read_unlock(outmost)
> + *
> + *
> + * sync = tid; ctr = 0;
> + * smp_mb_master(); smp_mb_slave();
But smp_mb_slave() expands to 'asm volatile("" : : : "memory")'
for RCU_SIGNAL, which would open up a number of vulnerabilities.
And yes, smp_mb_master() does a memory barrier on all CPUs in
the RCU_SIGNAL case, but that only guarantees that if there was
a reader pre-dating the beginning of the grace period, that if
that reader accessed any pre-grace-period state, we also see
that reader. Misordering of the rcu_read_unlock() with the
prior critical section, and this is why there is an smp_mb_master()
prior to exit from synchronize_rcu().
So for this to work, I believe that you need an smp_mb_master()
between checking the index->ctr and doing the urcu_sync_proxy_unlock().
Or am I missing something that restricts URCU priority boosting
to RCU_MB (where it looks like it might work)? Or missing some
extra synchronization in there somewhere?
> + * test ctr and wait; test sync and wakeup;
> + */
> +
> +void synchronize_rcu(void)
> +{
> + struct rcu_reader *index;
> + int32_t self = syscall(SYS_gettid);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&rcu_gp_lock);
> +
> + if (cds_list_empty(®istry))
> + goto out;
> +
> + cds_list_for_each_entry(index, ®istry, node)
> + urcu_sync_proxy_lock(&index->sync, index->tid);
> +
> + smp_mb_master(RCU_MB_GROUP);
> +
> + cds_list_for_each_entry(index, ®istry, node) {
> + if (_CMM_LOAD_SHARED(index->ctr) == 0) {
> + urcu_sync_proxy_unlock(&index->sync);
> + } else {
> + /* reader still running, we need to wait reader */
> + urcu_sync_lock(&index->sync, self);
> + urcu_sync_unlock(&index->sync, self);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* ensure rcu_read_unlock() finish when we found the ctr==0 */
> + smp_mb_master(RCU_MB_GROUP); /* ensure rcu_read_unlock() finish */
> +
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&rcu_gp_lock);
> +}
> #endif /* #else #ifndef URCU_WAIT_READER */
>
> /*
> @@ -437,7 +484,9 @@ void rcu_read_unlock(void)
>
> void rcu_register_thread(void)
> {
> + rcu_reader.tid = syscall(SYS_gettid);
> rcu_reader.pthread = pthread_self();
> + rcu_reader.sync = 0;
> assert(rcu_reader.need_mb == 0);
> assert(!(rcu_reader.ctr & RCU_GP_CTR_NEST_MASK));
>
> diff --git a/urcu/static/urcu.h b/urcu/static/urcu.h
> index 32d1af8..0941fd2 100644
> --- a/urcu/static/urcu.h
> +++ b/urcu/static/urcu.h
> @@ -221,9 +221,11 @@ static inline void smp_mb_slave(int group)
> struct rcu_reader {
> /* Data used by both reader and synchronize_rcu() */
> unsigned long ctr;
> + int32_t sync;
> char need_mb;
> /* Data used for registry */
> struct cds_list_head node __attribute__((aligned(CAA_CACHE_LINE_SIZE)));
> + pid_t tid;
> pthread_t pthread;
> };
>
> @@ -313,6 +315,46 @@ static inline int32_t urcu_sync_lock_onwer(int32_t *lock)
> return _CMM_LOAD_SHARED(*lock) & ~FUTEX_WAITERS;
> }
>
> +void __urcu_read_unlock_specail(void);
> +
> +static inline void _rcu_read_lock(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long tmp;
> +
> + cmm_barrier();
> + tmp = rcu_reader.ctr;
> +
> + if (!tmp) {
> + _CMM_STORE_SHARED(rcu_reader.ctr, 1);
> + smp_mb_slave(RCU_MB_GROUP);
> + } else {
> + _CMM_STORE_SHARED(rcu_reader.ctr, tmp + 1);
> + cmm_barrier();
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static inline void _rcu_read_unlock(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long tmp;
> +
> + cmm_barrier();
> + tmp = rcu_reader.ctr;
> +
> + if (tmp == 1) {
> + smp_mb_slave(RCU_MB_GROUP);
> +
> + rcu_reader.ctr = 0;
> + smp_mb_slave(RCU_MB_GROUP);
> +
> + if (unlikely(urcu_sync_lock_onwer(&rcu_reader.sync)
> + == rcu_reader.tid))
> + __urcu_read_unlock_specail();
> + } else {
> + _CMM_STORE_SHARED(rcu_reader.ctr, tmp - 1);
> + cmm_barrier();
> + }
> +}
> +
> #endif /* #else #ifndef URCU_WAIT_READER */
>
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> --
> 1.7.4.4
>
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list