[ltt-dev] [UST PATCH 1/3] Change code for consistency

Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers at polymtl.ca
Fri Sep 17 17:07:41 EDT 2010


* David Goulet (david.goulet at polymtl.ca) wrote:
> Frankly, I don't know what is CPP. I'll be happy if you can show me what it is.
> 
> However, every patch that I submit, I tested them with the tests/runtests and my
> benchmark test.

You know it, just just don't know it's called "CPP". It stands for "C
Preprocessor". gcc -E runs the preprocessor stage only.

Mathieu

> 
> Thanks
> David
> 
> Selon Nils Carlson <nils.carlson at ludd.ltu.se>:
> 
> > Looks good!
> >
> > Have you tried piping the old and new one through CPP with a file
> > containing just one marker and running diff aftwerwards? This is sort
> > of a good "test" when playing with the macros to make sure you've got
> > it all right. Also very educational as you get to see what everything
> > expands into in the end.
> >
> > /Nils
> > On Sep 17, 2010, at 9:41 PM, David Goulet wrote:
> >
> > > Use the kcompat stringify header for double level
> > > stringification for markers section.
> > >
> > > Also use the GET_MARKER macro for uniformity across the code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Goulet <david.goulet at polymtl.ca>
> > > ---
> > > include/ust/marker.h |   33 +++++++++++++++------------------
> > > 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/ust/marker.h b/include/ust/marker.h
> > > index 2751f58..287f20f 100644
> > > --- a/include/ust/marker.h
> > > +++ b/include/ust/marker.h
> > > @@ -30,15 +30,12 @@
> > > #include <urcu/list.h>
> > > #include <ust/processor.h>
> > > #include <ust/kcompat/kcompat.h>
> > > +#include <ust/kcompat/stringify.h>
> > >
> > > #include <bits/wordsize.h>
> > >
> > > struct marker;
> > >
> > > -/* To stringify the expansion of a define */
> > > -#define XSTR(d) STR(d)
> > > -#define STR(s) #s
> > > -
> > > /**
> > >  * marker_probe_func - Type of a marker probe function
> > >  * @mdata: marker data
> > > @@ -83,6 +80,8 @@ struct marker {
> > > #define CONFIG_MARKERS
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_MARKERS
> > >
> > > +#define GET_MARKER(channel, name)	(__mark_##channel##_##name)
> > > +
> > > #define _DEFINE_MARKER(channel, name, tp_name_str, tp_cb, format,
> > > unique, m)			\
> > > 		struct registers regs;								\
> > > 												\
> > > @@ -96,14 +95,14 @@ struct marker {
> > > 		      * will try to create the same symbols, resulting in a
> > > conflict. This	\
> > > 		      * is not unusual as it can be the result of function
> > > inlining.		\
> > > 		      */									\
> > > -		     ".ifndef __mstrtab_" XSTR(channel) "_" XSTR(name)
> > > "_channel_" XSTR(unique) "\n\t"	\
> > > +		     ".ifndef __mstrtab_" __stringify(channel) "_"
> > > __stringify(name) "_channel_" __stringify(unique) "\n\t"	\
> > > 		     /*".section __markers_strings\n\t"*/					\
> > > 		     ".section __markers_strings,\"aw\", at progbits\n\t"				\
> > > -		     "__mstrtab_" XSTR(channel) "_" XSTR(name) "_channel_"
> > > XSTR(unique) ":\n\t"	\
> > > -		     ".string \"" XSTR(channel) "\"\n\t"					\
> > > -		     "__mstrtab_" XSTR(channel) "_" XSTR(name) "_name_"
> > > XSTR(unique) ":\n\t"	\
> > > -		     ".string \"" XSTR(name) "\"\n\t"						\
> > > -		     "__mstrtab_" XSTR(channel) "_" XSTR(name) "_format_"
> > > XSTR(unique) ":\n\t"	\
> > > +		     "__mstrtab_" __stringify(channel) "_" __stringify(name)
> > > "_channel_" __stringify(unique) ":\n\t"	\
> > > +		     ".string \"" __stringify(channel) "\"\n\t"					\
> > > +		     "__mstrtab_" __stringify(channel) "_" __stringify(name)
> > > "_name_" __stringify(unique) ":\n\t"	\
> > > +		     ".string \"" __stringify(name) "\"\n\t"						\
> > > +		     "__mstrtab_" __stringify(channel) "_" __stringify(name)
> > > "_format_" __stringify(unique) ":\n\t"	\
> > > 		     ".string " "\"" format "\"" "\n\t"						\
> > > 		     ".previous\n\t"								\
> > > 		     ".endif\n\t"								\
> > > @@ -113,14 +112,14 @@ struct marker {
> > > 		     ".section __markers,\"aw\", at progbits\n\t"					\
> > > 		     ".balign 8\n\t" 								\
> > > 		     "2:\n\t" \
> > > -		     _ASM_PTR "(__mstrtab_" XSTR(channel) "_" XSTR(name)
> > > "_channel_" XSTR(unique) ")\n\t" /* channel string */ \
> > > -		     _ASM_PTR "(__mstrtab_" XSTR(channel) "_" XSTR(name) "_name_"
> > > XSTR(unique) ")\n\t" /* name string */ \
> > > -		     _ASM_PTR "(__mstrtab_" XSTR(channel) "_" XSTR(name)
> > > "_format_" XSTR(unique) ")\n\t" /* format string */ \
> > > +		     _ASM_PTR "(__mstrtab_" __stringify(channel) "_"
> > > __stringify(name) "_channel_" __stringify(unique) ")\n\t" /* channel
> > > string */ \
> > > +		     _ASM_PTR "(__mstrtab_" __stringify(channel) "_"
> > > __stringify(name) "_name_" __stringify(unique) ")\n\t" /* name
> > > string */ \
> > > +		     _ASM_PTR "(__mstrtab_" __stringify(channel) "_"
> > > __stringify(name) "_format_" __stringify(unique) ")\n\t" /* format
> > > string */ \
> > > 		     ".byte 0\n\t" /* state imv */						\
> > > 		     ".byte 0\n\t" /* ptype */							\
> > > 		     ".word 0\n\t" /* channel_id */						\
> > > 		     ".word 0\n\t" /* event_id */						\
> > > -		     ".balign " XSTR(__WORDSIZE) " / 8\n\t" /* alignment */			\
> > > +		     ".balign " __stringify(__WORDSIZE) " / 8\n\t" /* alignment
> > > */			\
> > > 		     _ASM_PTR "(marker_probe_cb)\n\t" /* call */				\
> > > 		     _ASM_PTR "(__mark_empty_function)\n\t" /*
> > > marker_probe_closure single.field1 */ \
> > > 		     _ASM_PTR "0\n\t" /* marker_probe_closure single.field2 */			\
> > > @@ -146,7 +145,7 @@ struct marker {
> > > 		static const char __mstrtab_##channel##_##name[]	\
> > > 		__attribute__((section("__markers_strings")))		\
> > > 		= #channel "\0" #name "\0" format;			\
> > > -		static struct marker __mark_##channel##_##name		\
> > > +		static struct marker GET_MARKER(channel, name)		\
> > > 		__attribute__((section("__markers"), aligned(8))) =	\
> > > 		{ __mstrtab_##channel##_##name,				\
> > > 		  &__mstrtab_##channel##_##name[sizeof(#channel)],	\
> > > @@ -195,15 +194,13 @@ struct marker {
> > > 		}							\
> > > 		DEFINE_MARKER_TP(channel, name, tp_name, tp_cb, format);\
> > > 		__mark_check_format(format, ## args);			\
> > > -		(*__mark_##channel##_##name.call)(&__mark_##channel##_##name, \
> > > +		(*GET_MARKER(channel, name).call)(&GET_MARKER(channel, name), \
> > > 			call_private, &regs, ## args);				\
> > > 	} while (0)
> > >
> > > extern void marker_update_probe_range(struct marker *begin,
> > > 	struct marker *end);
> > >
> > > -#define GET_MARKER(channel, name)	(__mark_##channel##_##name)
> > > -
> > > #else /* !CONFIG_MARKERS */
> > > #define DEFINE_MARKER(channel, name, tp_name, tp_cb, format, m)
> > > #define __trace_mark(generic, channel, name, call_private, format,
> > > args...) \
> > > --
> > > 1.7.2.3
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ltt-dev mailing list
> > > ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> > > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com




More information about the lttng-dev mailing list