[ltt-dev] [PATCH] Change malloc to zmalloc for libust

David Goulet david.goulet at polymtl.ca
Tue Sep 7 09:08:33 EDT 2010


This patch was lost in translation I think...

I forgot to change my template, but next time I'll use [UST PATCH] as 
subject. Maybe ust-dev mailing list should be consider soon? It's 
becoming more and more loaded with patches! and It will increase!

Cheers
David

On 10-09-07 09:03 AM, David Goulet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: David Goulet<david.goulet at polymtl.ca>
> ---
>   libust/buffers.c    |    4 ++--
>   libust/marker.c     |    6 +++---
>   libust/tracectl.c   |    4 ++--
>   libust/tracepoint.c |    8 ++++----
>   4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libust/buffers.c b/libust/buffers.c
> index 5d9bb8e..374ec61 100644
> --- a/libust/buffers.c
> +++ b/libust/buffers.c
> @@ -777,11 +777,11 @@ static int ust_buffers_create_channel(const char *trace_name, struct ust_trace *
>   	ltt_chan->commit_count_mask = (~0UL>>  ltt_chan->n_subbufs_order);
>   	ltt_chan->n_cpus = get_n_cpus();
>   //ust//	ltt_chan->buf = percpu_alloc_mask(sizeof(struct ltt_channel_buf_struct), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_possible_map);
> -	ltt_chan->buf = (void *) malloc(ltt_chan->n_cpus * sizeof(void *));
> +	ltt_chan->buf = (void *) zmalloc(ltt_chan->n_cpus * sizeof(void *));
>   	if(ltt_chan->buf == NULL) {
>   		goto error;
>   	}
> -	ltt_chan->buf_struct_shmids = (int *) malloc(ltt_chan->n_cpus * sizeof(int));
> +	ltt_chan->buf_struct_shmids = (int *) zmalloc(ltt_chan->n_cpus * sizeof(int));
>   	if(ltt_chan->buf_struct_shmids == NULL)
>   		goto free_buf;
>
> diff --git a/libust/marker.c b/libust/marker.c
> index 19467d1..3351726 100644
> --- a/libust/marker.c
> +++ b/libust/marker.c
> @@ -428,10 +428,10 @@ static struct marker_entry *add_marker(const char *channel, const char *name,
>   		}
>   	}
>   	/*
> -	 * Using malloc here to allocate a variable length element. Could
> +	 * Using zmalloc here to allocate a variable length element. Could
>   	 * cause some memory fragmentation if overused.
>   	 */
> -	e = malloc(sizeof(struct marker_entry)
> +	e = zmalloc(sizeof(struct marker_entry)
>   		    + channel_len + name_len + format_len);
>   	if (!e)
>   		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> @@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ int marker_register_lib(struct marker *markers_start, int markers_count)
>   {
>   	struct lib *pl;
>
> -	pl = (struct lib *) malloc(sizeof(struct lib));
> +	pl = (struct lib *) zmalloc(sizeof(struct lib));
>
>   	pl->markers_start = markers_start;
>   	pl->markers_count = markers_count;
> diff --git a/libust/tracectl.c b/libust/tracectl.c
> index 8d57b8f..e64b26f 100644
> --- a/libust/tracectl.c
> +++ b/libust/tracectl.c
> @@ -675,9 +675,9 @@ static int do_cmd_get_subbuffer(const char *recvbuf, struct ustcomm_source *src)
>
>   			found = 1;
>
> -			bc = (struct blocked_consumer *) malloc(sizeof(struct blocked_consumer));
> +			bc = (struct blocked_consumer *) zmalloc(sizeof(struct blocked_consumer));
>   			if(bc == NULL) {
> -				ERR("malloc returned NULL");
> +				ERR("zmalloc returned NULL");
>   				goto unlock_traces;
>   			}
>   			bc->fd_consumer = src->fd;
> diff --git a/libust/tracepoint.c b/libust/tracepoint.c
> index 620a009..8783b53 100644
> --- a/libust/tracepoint.c
> +++ b/libust/tracepoint.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ struct tp_probes {
>
>   static inline void *allocate_probes(int count)
>   {
> -	struct tp_probes *p  = malloc(count * sizeof(struct probe)
> +	struct tp_probes *p  = zmalloc(count * sizeof(void *)
>   			+ sizeof(struct tp_probes));
>   	return p == NULL ? NULL : p->probes;
>   }
> @@ -225,10 +225,10 @@ static struct tracepoint_entry *add_tracepoint(const char *name)
>   		}
>   	}
>   	/*
> -	 * Using kmalloc here to allocate a variable length element. Could
> +	 * Using zmalloc here to allocate a variable length element. Could
>   	 * cause some memory fragmentation if overused.
>   	 */
> -	e = malloc(sizeof(struct tracepoint_entry) + name_len);
> +	e = zmalloc(sizeof(struct tracepoint_entry) + name_len);
>   	if (!e)
>   		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>   	memcpy(&e->name[0], name, name_len);
> @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ int tracepoint_register_lib(struct tracepoint *tracepoints_start, int tracepoint
>   {
>   	struct tracepoint_lib *pl;
>
> -	pl = (struct tracepoint_lib *) malloc(sizeof(struct tracepoint_lib));
> +	pl = (struct tracepoint_lib *) zmalloc(sizeof(struct tracepoint_lib));
>
>   	pl->tracepoints_start = tracepoints_start;
>   	pl->tracepoints_count = tracepoints_count;

-- 
David Goulet
LTTng project, DORSAL Lab.

PGP/GPG : 1024D/16BD8563
BE3C 672B 9331 9796 291A  14C6 4AF7 C14B 16BD 8563




More information about the lttng-dev mailing list