[ltt-dev] LTTng0.158 Linux-2629-RT kernel BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:685
naresh kamboju
naresh.kernel at gmail.com
Tue Feb 16 10:17:34 EST 2010
Hi,
After applying LTTng 0.158 patches on 2.6.29-RT with SMP and NON-SMP
found BUG on ARM target.
LTTng 0.158 patches with 2.6.29 is working fine.
Linux kernel: 2.6.29-RT
RT patches: patch-2.6.29.6-rt24-broken-out.tar.bz2
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.29.6-rt24-broken-out.tar.bz2
LTTng 0.158 patches are applied.
ARCH: ARM
Glibc: 2.9
gcc: 4.3.3
dmesg
{{{
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:685
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 720, name: lttd
Backtrace:
[<c002d434>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x10c) from [<c03a75d8>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
r7:000002ad r6:c045da78 r5:00001116 r4:c04ba400
[<c03a75c0>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c0041028>] (__might_sleep+0x120/0x14c)
[<c0040f08>] (__might_sleep+0x0/0x14c) from [<c03a9b18>]
(rt_spin_lock+0x38/0x68)
r7:ce319d04 r6:c0763660 r5:c05107a0 r4:c05107a0
[<c03a9ae0>] (rt_spin_lock+0x0/0x68) from [<c00570b0>]
(lock_timer_base+0x30/0x54)
r4:c05107a0
[<c0057080>] (lock_timer_base+0x0/0x54) from [<c00571b4>] (del_timer+0x2c/0x6c)
r8:c0023570 r7:ce319d38 r6:00740000 r5:ceb19ca4 r4:c0763660
[<c0057188>] (del_timer+0x0/0x6c) from [<c008e5ec>]
(disable_synthetic_tsc_ipi+0x24/0x30)
r5:ceb19ca4 r4:00000001
[<c008e5c8>] (disable_synthetic_tsc_ipi+0x0/0x30) from [<c0072e00>]
(generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x98/0xf4)
[<c0072d68>] (generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x0/0xf4)
from [<c0028368>] (do_IPI+0xc8/0x15c)
[<c00282a0>] (do_IPI+0x0/0x15c) from [<c00280c4>] (_text+0xc4/0x128)
Exception stack(0xce319d98 to 0xce319de0)
9d80: ffffffff ce319df4
9da0: 00000001 00000001 00000000 c04f6600 ce319e4c ce319dc0 c03aafcc c002800c
9dc0: c0726f20 00000000 00000000 0000002c c0726f00 000006f8 00000001 00000001
r8:0000001d r7:00000000 r6:fc000000 r5:ce319dc0 r4:00000001
[<c0028000>] (_text+0x0/0x128) from [<c03aafcc>] (__irq_svc+0x4c/0x74)
Exception stack(0xce319dc0 to 0xce319e08)
9dc0: c0726f20 00000000 00000000 0000002c c0726f00 000006f8 00000001 00000001
9de0: 00000000 00000000 c04f6600 ce319e4c c04f6774 ce319e08 c00a4498 c0097220
9e00: 40000013 ffffffff
[<c009701c>] (free_pages_bulk+0x0/0x2e4) from [<c00981b0>]
(free_hot_cold_page+0x2e0/0x320)
[<c0097ed0>] (free_hot_cold_page+0x0/0x320) from [<c009825c>]
(free_hot_page+0x14/0x18)
r8:cf81bb20 r7:cf264400 r6:cd9f7e00 r5:cf12bee0 r4:00000007
[<c0098248>] (free_hot_page+0x0/0x18) from [<c00982a4>] (__free_pages+0x44/0x50)
[<c0098260>] (__free_pages+0x0/0x50) from [<c022ef5c>]
(relay_destroy_buf+0x80/0xd4)
[<c022eedc>] (relay_destroy_buf+0x0/0xd4) from [<c022f54c>]
(relay_remove_buf+0x30/0x34)
r7:cf4fddb8 r6:cf4fddb8 r5:cf12bef4 r4:cf12bee0
[<c022f51c>] (relay_remove_buf+0x0/0x34) from [<c0239a24>] (kref_put+0x74/0x84)
r4:c022f51c
[<c02399b0>] (kref_put+0x0/0x84) from [<c022f56c>]
(relay_file_release+0x1c/0x28)
r5:cf3cb500 r4:cf4fddb8
[<c022f550>] (relay_file_release+0x0/0x28) from [<c022ced8>]
(ltt_release+0x30/0x5c)
[<c022cea8>] (ltt_release+0x0/0x5c) from [<c00bf46c>] (__fput+0xfc/0x1c0)
r5:00000010 r4:cf3cb500
[<c00bf370>] (__fput+0x0/0x1c0) from [<c00bf56c>] (fput+0x3c/0x40)
[<c00bf530>] (fput+0x0/0x40) from [<c00bbb2c>] (filp_close+0x7c/0x88)
[<c00bbab0>] (filp_close+0x0/0x88) from [<c00bbc4c>] (sys_close+0x114/0x158)
r6:cdc0dc60 r5:0000009d r4:cf1018ec
[<c00bbb38>] (sys_close+0x0/0x158) from [<c0028ca0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c)
}}}
After searching about the problem in lkml list, found the below link
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/25/29
After disabling below lines of code, BUG is disappeared.
{{{
kernel/timer.c | 4 2 + 2 - 0 !
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: b/kernel/timer.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -599,11 +599,11 @@ static struct tvec_base *lock_timer_base
struct tvec_base *prelock_base = timer->base;
base = tbase_get_base(prelock_base);
if (likely(base != NULL)) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock, *flags);
if (likely(prelock_base == timer->base))
return base;
/* The timer has migrated to another CPU */
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock, *flags);
}
cpu_relax();
}
}}}
Is this the right way to fix the BUG?
I am not sure.
please give me your comments.
Best regards
Naresh Kamboju
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list