[ltt-dev] multiple definition of `trace_clock' problem on linux-2.6.30-rc5

[srikanth krishnakar]

Is it for ARM architecture ?

-Srikanth

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Steve Langstaff
<steve.langstaff at pebblebay.com> wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I am having the following trouble compiling kernel linux-2.6.30-rc5 when
> patched with patch-2.6.30-rc5-lttng-0.136 and wondered if this is a known
> problem...
>
> ...
>  LD      kernel/time/built-in.o
>  CC      kernel/trace/ring_buffer.o
>  CC      kernel/trace/trace.o
>  CC      kernel/trace/trace_clock.o
>  CC      kernel/trace/trace_output.o
>  CC      kernel/trace/trace_stat.o
>  CC      kernel/trace/trace_printk.o
>  CC      kernel/trace/trace_nop.o
>  CC      kernel/trace/trace-clock-32-to-64.o
>  CC      kernel/trace/trace-clock.o
>  LD      kernel/trace/built-in.o
> kernel/trace/trace-clock.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `trace_clock'
> kernel/trace/trace_clock.o:trace_clock.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here
> arm-linux-ld: Warning: size of symbol `trace_clock' changed from 8 in
> kernel/trace/trace_clock.o to 4 in kernel/trace/trace-clock.o
> arm-linux-ld: Warning: type of symbol `trace_clock' changed from 2 to 1 in
> kernel/trace/trace-clock.o
> make[2]: *** [kernel/trace/built-in.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [kernel/trace] Error 2
> make: *** [kernel] Error 2
>
> I *think* that this is because the symbol trace_clock appears as both a
> variable and a function.
>
> FILE: include/asm-generic/trace-clock.h:
>
> extern atomic_long_t trace_clock;
>
> and
>
> FILE: kernel/trace/trace_clock.c:
>
> u64 notrace trace_clock(void)
> {
>        return cpu_clock(raw_smp_processor_id());
> }
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
>



-- 
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"

Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**********************