[ltt-dev] LTTng 0.89 for Linux 2.6.29-rc3
Paul E. McKenney
paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Feb 5 13:44:56 EST 2009
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:31:59PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Paul E. McKenney (paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:52:16PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> > > <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Are you using quilt to apply the patchset series file in the right order ?
> > > >
> > > > Ummm... No. I never have used quilt.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, there is a series file. I guess it would not be too hard to make
> > > > an appropriate "sh" command:
> > >
> > > How about trying?
> > >
> > > #quilt push -a
> >
> > Is the appropriate incantation as follows?
> >
> > cd <top of git tree>
> > mkdir patches
> > cp /tmp/patch-2.6.29-rc3-lttng-0.92/* patches
> > quilt push -a
> >
>
> Yes, exactly.
Whew! ;-)
> And from there you can follow the LTTng manual here :
>
> http://ltt.polymtl.ca/svn/trunk/lttv/LTTngManual.html
I get some fuzz and the following:
patching file kernel/trace/trace-clock-32-to-64.c
Patch attempted to create file kernel/trace/trace-clock-32-to-64.c,
which already exists.
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file
kernel/trace/trace-clock-32-to-64.c
Should I be starting from somewhere other than v2.6.29-rc3?
Thanx, Paul
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list