[ltt-dev] Problems with merging patch-2.6.30-rc2-lttng-0.126
Gregory Haskins
ghaskins at novell.com
Thu Apr 23 15:21:47 EDT 2009
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Gregory Haskins (ghaskins at novell.com) wrote:
>
>> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>
>>> * Gregory Haskins (ghaskins at novell.com) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> I am trying to apply 2.6.30-rc2-lttng-0.126 to a clean 2.6.30-rc2 and
>>>> I am getting lots of rejects. I went through one time and resolved all
>>>> the rejects, but the resulting kernel did trace properly so I perhaps
>>>> had some fuzz issues. What kernel base should I be using for this series?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hrm, weird, I may have messed up the packaging. I just released LTTng
>>> 0.127 which should not have such conflicts.
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Mathieu,
>> I am seeing more or less the same thing with 0.127. The series has a
>> ton of conflicts against 30-rc2 and even itself. Its as if the patches
>> are based on a different tree.
>>
>> Its probably operator error, but I cannot see what I am doing wrong.
>> Its the same procedure I have always used to bring your tree in.
>>
>>
>
> Hmmmmm... it works here... (just tested it again to make sure)
>
> Can you give me the exact sequence of operation you use to apply the
> patchset ? (getting kernel.org tarballs/git, unpacking the lttng
> patchset, using quilt...)
>
Sure, I am using git as the base, and then stgit "import" to pull the
series in. Here is a dump of my history from my current attempt:
1070 git clone -l linux-2.6 linux-2.6-ltt
1071 cd linux-2.6-ltt/
1072 wget
http://ltt.polymtl.ca/files/lttng/patch-2.6.30-rc2-lttng-0.127.tar.bz2
1073 tar -jxvf patch-2.6.30-rc2-lttng-0.127.tar.bz2
1074 git branch
1075 git checkout -b master v2.6.30-rc2
1076 git log
1077 stg init
1078 stg import --ignore -s patch-2.6.30-rc2-lttng-0.127/series
I have confirmed that Linus' 2.6.30-rc2 tag is the ancestor that
immediately precedes the first LTT patch. I have used this same
procedure for years successfully, including working with LTT. I'm sure
I am doing something wrong, but I can't see it.
-Greg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20090423/805fff1c/attachment-0003.pgp>
More information about the lttng-dev
mailing list